2015
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platelet-rich plasma does not enhance return to play in hamstring injuries: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: BackgroundTo evaluate the efficacy of a single platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection in reducing the return to sport duration in male athletes, following an acute hamstring injury.MethodsA randomised, three-arm (double-blind for the injection arms), parallel-group trial, in which 90 professional athletes with MRI positive hamstring injuries were randomised to injection with PRP-intervention, platelet-poor plasma (PPP-control) or no injection. All received an intensive standardised rehabilitation programme. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
160
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
160
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Two articles showed no benefit of PRP injection in combination with rehabilitation compared to rehabilitation alone (Total N=170). [9][10][11] One study (N=28), however, demonstrated that PRP injections combined with a rehabilitation program allowed significantly higher levels of pain relief, faster regeneration, and shorter recovery time following an acute hamstring injury than rehabilitation alone. 1 It is important to note that in this study, the control group demonstrated a very large standard deviation for time to return to play (42.5 days + 20.6 vs. 26.7 days + 7.0 for the PRP group).…”
Section: Implications For Practice Education and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two articles showed no benefit of PRP injection in combination with rehabilitation compared to rehabilitation alone (Total N=170). [9][10][11] One study (N=28), however, demonstrated that PRP injections combined with a rehabilitation program allowed significantly higher levels of pain relief, faster regeneration, and shorter recovery time following an acute hamstring injury than rehabilitation alone. 1 It is important to note that in this study, the control group demonstrated a very large standard deviation for time to return to play (42.5 days + 20.6 vs. 26.7 days + 7.0 for the PRP group).…”
Section: Implications For Practice Education and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,8,13 Furthermore, the articles included in this CAT suggest that age and severity of injury are two factors that may be affecting PRP effects on hamstring injury outcomes. The study supporting PRP injection 1 included subjects with a median age of 21 years, as compared to the other two studies whose subjects ranged from 18-50 years old, with only one study 9 reporting a mean age (25.9 + 5.8 years). Furthermore, PRP injection 1 may be supported in acute grade IIa hamstring injuries, or those with recurrent injuries as opposed to lower severity injuries.…”
Section: Implications For Practice Education and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Platelet-rich plasma is an orthobiologic that has recently gained popularity as an adjuvant treatment for musculoskeletal injuries [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. It is a volume of fractionated plasma from the patient's own blood that contains platelet concentrate.…”
Section: Spine Research Issn 2471-8173mentioning
confidence: 99%