2020
DOI: 10.4103/jcmrp.jcmrp_51_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platelet indices and blood cell ratios in acute coronary syndrome and their predictive values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 In 21,26 The study reveals that the mean (±SD) value of total platelet count was lower in cases than controls without any significant statistical difference (p -0.239). Total platelet count was 258±44 X 10 17,22,23,24,25,14,8,18,11 In our study, we found no significant difference (p -0.239) in mean platelet count between two groups. In such the prediction of MI is not possible from platelets count.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 In 21,26 The study reveals that the mean (±SD) value of total platelet count was lower in cases than controls without any significant statistical difference (p -0.239). Total platelet count was 258±44 X 10 17,22,23,24,25,14,8,18,11 In our study, we found no significant difference (p -0.239) in mean platelet count between two groups. In such the prediction of MI is not possible from platelets count.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…11, 18 On the other hand, Cameron H A et al and Hassan, N.A.E. et al observed significantly lower platelet count on admission in ST elevated MI subjects than normal control group 27,24. In our study, we found that ST-elevated MI was associated with higher mean platelet volume (MPV) which was significantly higher (p <0.001) in group I than group II.…”
mentioning
confidence: 48%
“…94 Although statistical and score-based methods are still con-95 sidered [41], [42], the machine learning methods are taking 96 over, showing better performances [43]- [45]. Also for ACS 97 prediction, EHRs play a crucial role [46], as well as the 98 application of novel deep artificial neural networks [47], 99 [48] and the quest for key biomarkers [49]. When dealing 100 with the scenario of an underlying IBD condition, predicting 101 CV events is still an uncharted territory, especially if relying only on EHR, let alone detecting significant biomark-103 ers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%