1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199805)40:2<180::aid-jbm2>3.0.co;2-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platelet adhesion onto chargeable functional group gradient surfaces

Abstract: Functional group gradients were prepared on low-density polyethylene (PE) sheets. The surface density of grafted functional groups was gradually changed along the sample length by way of corona discharge treatment with gradually increasing power following graft copolymerization of acrylic acid (AA), sodium p-styrene sulfonate (NaSS), or N,N-dimethyl aminopropyl acrylamide (DMAPAA). AA and NaSS are negatively chargeable and DMAPAA is positively chargeable in phosphate-buffered saline or plasma solution at pH 7.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation can be correlated with previous studies which have linked the negatively charged surface functionality inhibiting the migration of negatively charged cells towards the functionalized surface. 43,68,[78][79][80] Rather unexpectedly, we find that the density of surface functionality has little or no influence on tissuereactions to microsphere implants. These results contradict many in vitro observations which found cell adhesion to be directly correlated to the density of functionalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This observation can be correlated with previous studies which have linked the negatively charged surface functionality inhibiting the migration of negatively charged cells towards the functionalized surface. 43,68,[78][79][80] Rather unexpectedly, we find that the density of surface functionality has little or no influence on tissuereactions to microsphere implants. These results contradict many in vitro observations which found cell adhesion to be directly correlated to the density of functionalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…11,[18][19][20]23,57,58,60 Surface chemical properties of implant materials have been shown to affect protein adsorption and acute cellular responses. 33,34,42,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69] In the present study, we examined the hypothesis that biomaterial-mediated fibrotic reactions could be substantially reduced by altering both the type and/ordensity of surface functionality…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherent cells then slowly (typically within hours) spread over the surface, depending on compatibility with the surface, expressing a strong 'biological component of adhesion' [38] that includes secretion of extracellular matrix (ECM) and results in the flattening of cells on the substratum [2] (spreadcell length is about 3-10 times height [9]). Needless to say, (protein) composition of the fluid phase can greatly affect the entire cell adhesion process [31,33,[55][56][57][58][59]. Thus, it is apparent that the short-term (<3 days) cell adhesion/proliferation process spans a broad range of time and length scales.…”
Section: Cell Attachment and Proliferation Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polanowska-Grabowska and coworkers reported that the platelet adhesion rate on a gelatin-coated surface was lower than on collagen-coated or fibrinogen-coated surfaces [48]. However, blood coagulation is known to depend on material properties, such as surface-free energy, surface charge, and wettability; these properties govern protein adsorption involving platelet adhesion [49,50]. Experiments using human whole blood are needed to test the clinical applications of the gels.…”
Section: Biological Properties Of E-bc Gelmentioning
confidence: 99%