Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background and Aims Kalanchoideae is one of three subfamilies within Crassulaceae and contains four genera. Despite previous efforts, the phylogeny of Kalanchoideae remains inadequately resolved with persistent issues including low support, unstructured topologies and polytomies. This study aimed to address two central objectives: (1) resolving the pending phylogenetic questions within Kalanchoideae by using organelle-scale ‘barcodes’ (plastomes) and nuclear data; and (2) investigating interspecific diversity patterns among Kalanchoideae plastomes. Methods To explore the plastome evolution in Kalanchoideae, we newly sequenced 38 plastomes representing all four constituent genera (Adromischus, Cotyledon, Kalanchoe and Tylecodon). We performed comparative analyses of plastomic features, including GC and gene contents, gene distributions at the IR (inverted repeat) boundaries, nucleotide divergence, plastomic tRNA (pttRNA) structures and codon aversions. Additionally, phylogenetic inferences were inferred using both the plastomic dataset (79 genes) and nuclear dataset (1054 genes). Key Results Significant heterogeneities were observed in plastome lengths among Kalanchoideae, strongly correlated with LSC (large single copy) lengths. Informative diversities existed in the gene content at SSC/IRa (small single copy/inverted repeat a), with unique patterns individually identified in Adromischus leucophyllus and one major Kalanchoe clade. The ycf1 gene was assessed as a shared hypervariable region among all four genera, containing nine lineage-specific indels. Three pttRNAs exhibited unique structures specific to Kalanchoideae and the genera Adromischus and Kalanchoe. Moreover, 24 coding sequences revealed a total of 41 lineage-specific unused codons across all four constituent genera. The phyloplastomic inferences clearly depicted internal branching patterns in Kalanchoideae. Most notably, by both plastid- and nuclear-based phylogenies, our research offers the first evidence that Kalanchoe section Eukalanchoe is not monophyletic. Conclusions This study conducted comprehensive analyses on 38 newly reported Kalanchoideae plastomes. Importantly, our results not only reconstructed well-resolved phylogenies within Kalanchoideae, but also identified highly informative unique markers at the subfamily, genus and species levels. These findings significantly enhance our understanding of the evolutionary history of Kalanchoideae.
Background and Aims Kalanchoideae is one of three subfamilies within Crassulaceae and contains four genera. Despite previous efforts, the phylogeny of Kalanchoideae remains inadequately resolved with persistent issues including low support, unstructured topologies and polytomies. This study aimed to address two central objectives: (1) resolving the pending phylogenetic questions within Kalanchoideae by using organelle-scale ‘barcodes’ (plastomes) and nuclear data; and (2) investigating interspecific diversity patterns among Kalanchoideae plastomes. Methods To explore the plastome evolution in Kalanchoideae, we newly sequenced 38 plastomes representing all four constituent genera (Adromischus, Cotyledon, Kalanchoe and Tylecodon). We performed comparative analyses of plastomic features, including GC and gene contents, gene distributions at the IR (inverted repeat) boundaries, nucleotide divergence, plastomic tRNA (pttRNA) structures and codon aversions. Additionally, phylogenetic inferences were inferred using both the plastomic dataset (79 genes) and nuclear dataset (1054 genes). Key Results Significant heterogeneities were observed in plastome lengths among Kalanchoideae, strongly correlated with LSC (large single copy) lengths. Informative diversities existed in the gene content at SSC/IRa (small single copy/inverted repeat a), with unique patterns individually identified in Adromischus leucophyllus and one major Kalanchoe clade. The ycf1 gene was assessed as a shared hypervariable region among all four genera, containing nine lineage-specific indels. Three pttRNAs exhibited unique structures specific to Kalanchoideae and the genera Adromischus and Kalanchoe. Moreover, 24 coding sequences revealed a total of 41 lineage-specific unused codons across all four constituent genera. The phyloplastomic inferences clearly depicted internal branching patterns in Kalanchoideae. Most notably, by both plastid- and nuclear-based phylogenies, our research offers the first evidence that Kalanchoe section Eukalanchoe is not monophyletic. Conclusions This study conducted comprehensive analyses on 38 newly reported Kalanchoideae plastomes. Importantly, our results not only reconstructed well-resolved phylogenies within Kalanchoideae, but also identified highly informative unique markers at the subfamily, genus and species levels. These findings significantly enhance our understanding of the evolutionary history of Kalanchoideae.
The plastid organelle is vital for photosynthesis and energy production. Advances in sequencing technology have enabled the exploration of plastomic resources, offering insights into plant evolution, diversity, and conservation. As an important group of horticultural ornamentals in the Crassulaceae family, Sempervivum plants are known for their unique rosette-like structures and reproduction through offsets. Despite their popularity, the classification status of Sempervivum remains uncertain, with only a single plastome sequence currently available. Furthermore, codon usage bias (CUB) is a widespread phenomenon of the unbalanced usage of synonymous codons in the coding sequence (CDS). However, due to the limited available plastid data, there has been no research that focused on the CUB analysis among Sempervivum until now. To address these gaps, we sequenced and released the plastomes of seven species and one subspecies from Sempervivum, revealing several consistent patterns. These included a shared 110 bp extension of the rps19 gene, 14 hypervariable regions (HVRs) with distinct nucleotide diversity (π: 0.01173 to 0.02702), and evidence of selective pressures shaping codon usage. Notably, phylogenetic analysis robustly divided the monophyletic clade into two sections: Jovibarba and Sempervivum. In conclusion, this comprehensive plastomic resource provides valuable insights into Sempervivum evolution and offers potential molecular markers for DNA barcoding.
Sedum is the largest succulent genus in Crassulaceae. Because of predominant maternal inheritance, little recombination, and slow evolution, plastomes can serve as powerful super barcodes for inter- or intra-species phylogenetic analyses. While previous research has focused on plastomes between Sedum species, intra-species studies are scarce. Here, we sequenced plastomes from three Sedum species (Sedum alfredii, Sedum plumbizincicola, and Sedum japonicum) to understand their evolutionary relationships and plastome structural evolution. Our analyses revealed minimal size and GC content variation across species. However, gene distribution at IR boundaries, repeat structures, and codon usage patterns showed diversity at both inter-specific and intra-specific levels. Notably, an rps19 gene expansion and a bias toward A/T-ending codons were observed. Codon aversion motifs also varied, potentially serving as markers for future studies. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed the non-monophyly of Sedum and divided the Acre clade into two groups. Individuals from the same species clustered together, with strong support for the relationships between S. alfredii, S. tricarpum, and S. plumbizincicola. Additionally, S. japonicum clearly affiliates with the Acre clade. This study provides valuable insights into both intra-specific and intra-generic plastome variation in Sedum, as well as overall plastome evolution within the genus.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.