2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2021.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastid genome evolution of a monophyletic group in the subtribe Lauriineae (Laureae, Lauraceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using the chloroplast genomes of L. obtusiloba from different geographic regions and 51 plastomes of the "core Laureae." Our results support the monophyletic origin of the "core Laureae" and the monophyletic status of the clade Litsea I, Lindera II, Lindera IV, Lindera V, and Lindera VI, which are consistent with some previous work (Jo et al, 2019;Liu, Chen, et al, 2021;Liu, Ma, et al, 2021;Song et al, 2020;Tian et al, 2019;Xiao et al, 2020). Phylogenetic results of the clade Litsea III, Lindera V, and Lindera VI in our studies are in agreement with a previous phylogenetic work by Zhao et al (2018), who defined the relationships among the species located in sub-clade I, and sub-clade II containing Lindera sect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using the chloroplast genomes of L. obtusiloba from different geographic regions and 51 plastomes of the "core Laureae." Our results support the monophyletic origin of the "core Laureae" and the monophyletic status of the clade Litsea I, Lindera II, Lindera IV, Lindera V, and Lindera VI, which are consistent with some previous work (Jo et al, 2019;Liu, Chen, et al, 2021;Liu, Ma, et al, 2021;Song et al, 2020;Tian et al, 2019;Xiao et al, 2020). Phylogenetic results of the clade Litsea III, Lindera V, and Lindera VI in our studies are in agreement with a previous phylogenetic work by Zhao et al (2018), who defined the relationships among the species located in sub-clade I, and sub-clade II containing Lindera sect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Aperula, sect. Polyadenia and trinerved Lindera complex have been successfully detected and classified via whole plastomic analyses (Fijridiyanto & Murakami, 2009;Li et al, 2004Li et al, , 2007Liu, Chen, et al, 2021;Liu, Ma, et al, 2021;Tian et al, 2019;Xiao et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ycf1 was indicated to be the most variable loci and showed better phylogenetic resolutions than standard DNA barcodes in land plants [84]. ycf2, petA-psbJ, and ndhF-rpl32-trnL UAG were not always hypervariable among different taxa [54,64,85], suggesting that the three loci were taxa-specific barcodes. Given the limited sampling in this study, more species with multiple samples of tribe Cinnamomeae should be included in future work to evaluate the discriminative power of ycf2, petA-psbJ, and ndhF-rpl32-trnL UAG .…”
Section: Candidate Dna Barcodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, plastome sequences were used to construct robust trees in which the Cryptocaryeae form a well-supported monophyletic clade (Song & al., 2017. By developing a well-resolved backbone phylogeny for the Lauraceae, confirmed that the tribes Cassytheae, Caryodaphnopsideae, Cryptocaryeae, Hypodaphnideae, Laureae, and Neocinnamomeae are highly supported (ML-BS 100% and BI-PP 1.0), as expected from morphology (Tian & al., 2019;Liu & al., 2022). Also using plastome sequences, another recent phylogenetic study showed a well-supported Beilschmiedia group comprising 35 species, suggesting the Beilschmiedia clade diverged in the Upper Paleogene and that migration of Beilschmiedia between Asia and the Americas occurred many times .…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%