Plasticity of a Guidance System for Software Process Modeling

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Quality Assessment Model of the Adaptive Guidance

“…This trend seems interesting, however, it only poses a problem in the ability and quality adaptation to the possible variations of the development context (Garcia and Pacheco, 2009;kirk et al, 2009). For this, it is necessary to assist developers and ensure the plasticity of the adaptive guidance systems (Calvary et al, 2002;Coutaz, 2010;Khemissa et al, 2012;Khemissa et al, 2014) with their ability to adapt to the current development context, defined by the triplet (material platform, developer profile, activity context), in respect of their usefulness. Usefulness refers rigorously to quality services offered to developers.…”

“…In a first stage, our work is rather focused on the study and synthesis of the limits of the existing software process modeling environments (Calvary et al, 2002;Coutaz, 2010;Khemissa et al, 2012). Taking into account specific factors for an adaptive guidance, we have classified these limits through retained factors describing explicitly the basic concepts linked to the adaptive guidance aspect (Khemissa et al, 2012;Khemissa et al, 2014). To realize the effectiveness of plasticity concept of the guidance system supported by its adaptation ability to current development context, the selected guidance quality factors are defined by:…”

“…In this context, we have proposed an approach to define adaptive guidance modeling in software process. It has been described through a meta-model denoted PGM (Plasticity of Guidance Meta model) based on the concepts of development context's profile (Khemissa et al, 2012;Khemissa et al, 2014). This approach is defined in a Y description of the adaptive guidance.…”