2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2010.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasticity in the vocalizations of anurans in response to traffic noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
100
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
100
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Green Frogs (Lithobates clamitans) and Northern Leopard Frogs (Lithobates pipiens) significantly increased dominant frequency of their calls in response to traffic noise (L. clamitans: from ca. 480 to 860 Hz in average; L. pipiens: from 850 to 1200 Hz at average; Cunnington & Fahrig 2010). Penna et al (2005) showed that Eupsophus calcaratus increased call duration and call rate in response to abiotic background noise (wind, rain, creek and sea surf), and they suggested these vocal responses are adaptations that allow frogs to cope with high interference with sounds produced by the local acoustic environment.…”
Section: Social Context and Acoustic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green Frogs (Lithobates clamitans) and Northern Leopard Frogs (Lithobates pipiens) significantly increased dominant frequency of their calls in response to traffic noise (L. clamitans: from ca. 480 to 860 Hz in average; L. pipiens: from 850 to 1200 Hz at average; Cunnington & Fahrig 2010). Penna et al (2005) showed that Eupsophus calcaratus increased call duration and call rate in response to abiotic background noise (wind, rain, creek and sea surf), and they suggested these vocal responses are adaptations that allow frogs to cope with high interference with sounds produced by the local acoustic environment.…”
Section: Social Context and Acoustic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, such plasticity often allows for the quickest adaptive phenotypic change in a human-disturbed environment (Van Buskirk 2012), and studies showcasing such plasticity abound. Some birds and anurans, for example, exhibit short-term changes in aspects of acoustic communication in order to overcome anthropogenic background noise (e.g., Gross et al 2010;Cunnington and Fahrig 2010), great tits plastically adjust the timing of reproduction with climate change (Charmantier et al 2008), orangecrowned warblers adjust nesting behavior and parental provisioning in the presence of a novel predator (Peluc et al 2008), etc. While some plastic changes in response to novel environments are adaptive, other plastic changes are clearly maladaptive (e.g., Ghalambor et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies (60 out and anurans, either through behavioural plasticity or evolutionary adaptation [14,47,48]. Some studies have also considered the impact of masking on adventitious signals [28,49].…”
Section: (A) Behavioural Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…neurological) particularly challenging. Studies that pair different types of work in different settings [48,64] offer the best solution, allowing the benefits of each approach to be used.…”
Section: (B) Difficulties In Drawing Strong Ecologically Valid Conclmentioning
confidence: 99%