1929
DOI: 10.1038/123714a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasticity and Water Absorption of Clays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1931
1931
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was probably due to the lower fraction of clay which resulted in lower water content and therefore a minor shrinkage during evaporation. Indeed, the water absorption capacity of the polyamide (Paolucci et al , 2019) is far lower than that of the clay (Oakley, 1929; White and Pichler, 1959).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was probably due to the lower fraction of clay which resulted in lower water content and therefore a minor shrinkage during evaporation. Indeed, the water absorption capacity of the polyamide (Paolucci et al , 2019) is far lower than that of the clay (Oakley, 1929; White and Pichler, 1959).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sodium carbonate definitely reduces the percentage of water at the sticky point except in the highly colloidal soil B.T., the value for which is not affected by either sodium chloride or sodium carbonate in the concentrations used. The results are of interest when considered in conjunction with the experiments of van Wyk(i4) and of Oakley (13). These workers found that the higher the concentration of the salt used the lower is the figure obtained for water absorbed.…”
Section: Effect Of Electrolytes In Soilmentioning
confidence: 79%