2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastic-hinge approach for inelastic analysis of steel–concrete framed structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second-order refined plastic hinge analysis method, used to assess the performance of steel and composite (steel-concrete) structures under fire conditions, previously validated for continuous frames (Landesmann, 2010), is presented in this paper for semi-rigid connections. The computational approach, SAAFE Program (Landesmann et al, 2009), has been developed based on the Advanced Analysis concept (Chen et al, 1996), taking into account the non-linear behavior of material at elevated temperatures, as recommended by part 1.2 of Eurocode 4 (EC4-1.2, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A second-order refined plastic hinge analysis method, used to assess the performance of steel and composite (steel-concrete) structures under fire conditions, previously validated for continuous frames (Landesmann, 2010), is presented in this paper for semi-rigid connections. The computational approach, SAAFE Program (Landesmann et al, 2009), has been developed based on the Advanced Analysis concept (Chen et al, 1996), taking into account the non-linear behavior of material at elevated temperatures, as recommended by part 1.2 of Eurocode 4 (EC4-1.2, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed two-dimensional plastic-hinge model considers the following characteristics to be discussed in the presented section (Chen et al, 1996;Liew et al, 2002;Landesmann, 2010): (i) distributed plasticity effects described by a stiffness parameter η, evaluated as a function of the yielding progress at each plastic-hinge location, (ii) an approximate scheme based on an effective tangentmodulus E t concept, which reduces the modulus of elasticity in the element stiffness calculation, considering both the residual stress and out-of-straightness effects, and (iii) a second-order formulation based on conventional stability functions allowing an accurate identification of member instability with low computational efforts. The following assumptions are made for the stiffness formulation of the present approach: (i) the members are prismatic and slender in which the Bernoulli-Euler hypothesis is valid, (ii) lateral-torsional buckling, twisting effect, warping and shear deformations are neglected, (iii) nodal load response is only included in the present formulation, (iv) capacity of concrete under tension is negligible, (v) no separation between steel beam and concrete is allowed, and (vi) element is elastic and all material nonlinearities are allowed for in a plastic-hinge spring.…”
Section: Proposed Numerical Analysis Approach Basic Assumptions and Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Through his paper, Landesmann [65] (2010) presented an application of a computational tool, named SAAFE Program, developed to analyze nonlinear inelastic steel and composite 2D framed structures. The proposed plastic-hinge model was formulated based on three characteristics which controlled the beam stiffness, the residual stresses and the structural member instability.…”
Section: Chapter 1 Athens Jan 2011mentioning
confidence: 99%