2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14175040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastic Crushing Failure of Bio-Inspired Cellular Hierarchical Topological Sandwich Core

Abstract: Bio-inspired self-similar hierarchical honeycombs are multifunctional cellular topologies used for resisting various loadings. However, the crushing behavior under large plastic deformation is still unknown. This paper investigates the in-plane compressive response of selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated hierarchical honeycombs. The effects of hierarchical order, relative density as well as constituent material are evaluated. The results show that at small deformation, the AlSi10Mg alloy hierarchical honey… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results (Table 1) indicate that the mechanical anisotropy of the 316L steel material is inconspicuous, which is different from that of AlSi10Mg alloy. 11,23 Out-of-plane compressive response of hierarchical honeycombs…”
Section: Uniaxial Tensile Characteristics Of Parent Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results (Table 1) indicate that the mechanical anisotropy of the 316L steel material is inconspicuous, which is different from that of AlSi10Mg alloy. 11,23 Out-of-plane compressive response of hierarchical honeycombs…”
Section: Uniaxial Tensile Characteristics Of Parent Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results (Table 1) indicate that the mechanical anisotropy of the 316L steel material is inconspicuous, which is different from that of AlSi10Mg alloy. 11,23
Figure 2.(a) Geometric dimension and SLM fabricating directions of tensile test coupon; (b) Uniaxial tensile stress-strain response of 316L steel parent material.
…”
Section: Experimental Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, a sandwich structure is composed of solid face and back plates, and a lightweight cellular core. While the cellular core absorbs a considerable amount of energy, various types of cores with excellent energy absorption capacity have been proposed, for instance, metal foam core [ 11 , 12 ], polymeric foam core [ 13 , 14 ], foam concrete core [ 15 , 16 , 17 ], honeycomb core [ 18 ], negative Poisson’s ratio honeycomb core [ 19 ], foam-filled honeycomb core [ 20 , 21 ], and other high-performance cores [ 22 ]. The mechanical performance and energy absorption of these core materials or structures subjected to quasi-static and dynamic loads have been extensively and intensively investigated based on the approaches of experimental tests, numerical simulations, and theoretical analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structures can present multiple attractive properties depending on the specific application, such as light weight, high specific stiffness, and high energy absorption capacity [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Sandwich panel fabrication is one of the most widely studied and reported in the literature [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Properties such as high impact energy absorption increase the use of cellular materials as protective structures [ 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%