2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12328-019-00962-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastic bread clip impacted in gastrointestinal tract: a case report and review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of bread clip ingestion and its sequelae is uncommon in clinical practice and there are only case reports available in the literature. Most cases of accidental bread clip ingestion have been described in elderly, edentulous patients or the visually impaired 1 . Our patient had no recollection of ever swallowing a bread clip.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The incidence of bread clip ingestion and its sequelae is uncommon in clinical practice and there are only case reports available in the literature. Most cases of accidental bread clip ingestion have been described in elderly, edentulous patients or the visually impaired 1 . Our patient had no recollection of ever swallowing a bread clip.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Most cases of accidental bread clip ingestion have been described in elderly, edentulous patients or the visually impaired. 1 Our patient had no recollection of ever swallowing a bread clip. He suspected a bread clip may have fallen into his cup of coffee and he had accidentally swallowed it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The complication rate is positively correlated with the retention time and increases by two and seven times after 24 and 72 hours, respectively. 7 The incidence of perforation caused by sharp foreign bodies is as high as 15% to 35%. 8 In contrast to fishbones and iron wires, blades have both piercing and cutting effects on soft tissue, and they had been retained for more than 36 hours in the present case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%