2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.05.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasmon dispersion in metallic carbon nanotubes in the presence of low-frequency electromagnetic radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of these plasmons are exactly matching with the earlier reports. 8,9,10 In case of type I composite, the SP 2 hybridized electrons are excited at a wavelength of 56.76 nm which is similar to the plasmon excitation in CNT. The π plasmon in the composite shows an increase in absorption and increase in excitation energy when compared to excitation in CNT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values of these plasmons are exactly matching with the earlier reports. 8,9,10 In case of type I composite, the SP 2 hybridized electrons are excited at a wavelength of 56.76 nm which is similar to the plasmon excitation in CNT. The π plasmon in the composite shows an increase in absorption and increase in excitation energy when compared to excitation in CNT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…7 Usually single wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) shows two bulk plasmons (σ+π plasmon and π plasmon) and one surface plasmon near 20, 5 and 13 eV respectively. 8,9,10 Axial straining of the SWCNT shows a shift in the π plasmon frequency in case of perpendicular incidence of light. 6 The electric field localization near plasmon frequency increased to 10% when compared with parallel incidence of light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reading very carefully the paper by Shokri and co-workers, 1 we observe that this work is largely a copy of our paper, 2 and also that no reference was made to our paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…9 is also largely a copy of our work 6 and again there is no reference to our works. 2,4,6 and other papers. 5,7 …”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The ion and nanoparticle number density perturbations, deduced from (4)-(6) by using (9), are, respectively,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%