2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.114.205003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasmoids Formation During Simulations of Coaxial Helicity Injection in the National Spherical Torus Experiment

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, reconnecting current sheets exceeding a certain aspect ratio cannot form because they become unstable to the formation of plasmoids, which break the reconnection layer into shorter elements, consequently leading to a significant increase in the reconnection rate (Daughton et al 2006(Daughton et al , 2009. Hence, the predictions of the classical Sweet-Parker reconnection model (Sweet 1958;Parker 1957) break down for sufficiently large systems such as those typically encountered in astrophysical environments -in these cases, it was shown that the reconnection rate becomes nearly independent of the magnetic diffusivity (Bhattacharjee et al 2009;Huang & Bhattacharjee 2010;Uzdensky et al 2010;Loureiro et al 2012;Takamoto 2013;Comisso et al 2015a;Ebrahimi & Raman 2015;Comisso & Grasso 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reconnecting current sheets exceeding a certain aspect ratio cannot form because they become unstable to the formation of plasmoids, which break the reconnection layer into shorter elements, consequently leading to a significant increase in the reconnection rate (Daughton et al 2006(Daughton et al , 2009. Hence, the predictions of the classical Sweet-Parker reconnection model (Sweet 1958;Parker 1957) break down for sufficiently large systems such as those typically encountered in astrophysical environments -in these cases, it was shown that the reconnection rate becomes nearly independent of the magnetic diffusivity (Bhattacharjee et al 2009;Huang & Bhattacharjee 2010;Uzdensky et al 2010;Loureiro et al 2012;Takamoto 2013;Comisso et al 2015a;Ebrahimi & Raman 2015;Comisso & Grasso 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation, combined with other observations from a slow mid-plane camera (not shown here), which shows a bright region moving from the lower end-plate to the upper end-plate, indicates that the CHI plasma must be disconnecting from the injector flux in the lower end-plate and drifting up. Such plasmas must carry closed field line currents, as they are no longer connected to the injector flux [8]. In these first experiments, because the PF3-2 and PF5-2 coils are driven in pairs, the PF3-2 coil above the upper end-plate is in a polarity so as to attract the CHI plasma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the role of the asymmetric instability reported here is distinct from that of plasmoid formation as part of the global fluxsurface closure after injection, which is predicted in axisymmetric simulations of NSTX. 18,19 To our knowledge, at the present time there are no experimental studies that can be used to determine if this mode is present in laboratory, helicity-injected plasmas. To the extent that the linear mode is current-driven, it is purely growing with no real part of the frequency and thus would not show up as a coherent oscillation, although Doppler-shift effects could generate oscillations in the laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying resistive instability is the same basic current-sheet instability that is receiving renewed interest in the context of magnetic reconnection. [15][16][17][18][19]24 That the resulting nonlinear dynamics have greater impact as the modeled impurity concentration is reduced and temperature increases likely reflects a smaller current-sheet width at lower resistivity, which has a role in plasmoid formation. 16,17 However, during the phase of modeled active injection, the footpoints of the current channel are distant, and the instability is not part of the reconnection process that forms closed flux on the global scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation