1996
DOI: 10.1006/expr.1996.0077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasmodium falciparum:Amplification and Overexpression ofpfmdr1Is Not Necessary for Increased Mefloquine Resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One might be an interplay between mechanisms of mefloquine and chloroquine resistance as suggested by Lim and others. 18 In that study, selection for increased mefloquine resistance of P. falciparum FAC8 did not alter the copy number or the level of expression of pfmdr1. In addition, the level of chloroquine resistance of these selected parasites showed a small increase during selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…One might be an interplay between mechanisms of mefloquine and chloroquine resistance as suggested by Lim and others. 18 In that study, selection for increased mefloquine resistance of P. falciparum FAC8 did not alter the copy number or the level of expression of pfmdr1. In addition, the level of chloroquine resistance of these selected parasites showed a small increase during selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Attempts to answer the question related to pfmdr1 gene amplification also have a history of conflicting results. Some studies have reported increased copy numbers with selection for mefloquine resistance (5,12), while others have not (9,10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clones of P. falciparum selected in vitro for high mefloquine resistance showed evidence of amplification and overexpression of pfmdr1 (14,31), whereas a decrease in resistance was associated with deamplification of the gene (2). However, in other studies no amplification was found in parasites selected for increased resistance (27,40,42). An association between amplification of pfmdr1 and mefloquine resistance has been claimed in some field investigations (34,35,51) but not in others (3,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%