1999
DOI: 10.1021/bi9824792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasmin Desensitization of the PAR1 Thrombin Receptor:  Kinetics, Sites of Truncation, and Implications for Thrombolytic Therapy

Abstract: It has been hypothesized that protease-activated receptors may be activated and attenuated by more than one protease. Here, we explore a desensitization mechanism of the PAR1 thrombin receptor by anticoagulant proteases and provide an explanation to the enigma of why plasmin/tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) can both activate and deactivate platelets prior to thrombin treatment. By using a soluble N-terminal exodomain (TR78) as a model for the full-length receptor, we were able to unambiguously compare cleav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
220
3
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
220
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kuliopulos et al (26) showed with calcium mobilization studies that plasmin has a low affinity for the traditional thrombin cleavage site on PAR-1 and a higher affinity for a cleavage site that is further downstream; in effect, plasmin is more likely to make PAR-1 refractory to further thrombin stimulation than to stimulate calcium mobilization. In addition, platelets stimulated with plasmin after a short period failed to desensitize calcium mobilization to further simulation with SFLLRN (26), and these observations were validated in our laboratory (data not shown). Furthermore, our results explain the contradiction of previous reports concerning the ability of plasmin to inhibit thrombinand SFLLRN-induced calcium mobilization in platelets (20,21).…”
Section: Fig 2 Plasmin Desensitizes Par-1 or Par-4 After Long Incubsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Kuliopulos et al (26) showed with calcium mobilization studies that plasmin has a low affinity for the traditional thrombin cleavage site on PAR-1 and a higher affinity for a cleavage site that is further downstream; in effect, plasmin is more likely to make PAR-1 refractory to further thrombin stimulation than to stimulate calcium mobilization. In addition, platelets stimulated with plasmin after a short period failed to desensitize calcium mobilization to further simulation with SFLLRN (26), and these observations were validated in our laboratory (data not shown). Furthermore, our results explain the contradiction of previous reports concerning the ability of plasmin to inhibit thrombinand SFLLRN-induced calcium mobilization in platelets (20,21).…”
Section: Fig 2 Plasmin Desensitizes Par-1 or Par-4 After Long Incubsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Lipofectamine 2000, dNTPs, oligo(dT) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] primer, AccuPrime DNA polymerase, and Fluo-3 acetoxymethyl ester were all purchased from Invitrogen. Primers were designed "in house" and purchased from MWG-Biotech (Ebersberg, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…trypsin and neutrophil proteinases) have been reported to activate and/or disarm PAR 1 in different cell systems (2, 4, 8, 13, 14, 16 -18). Activation and desensitization of PAR 1 must be well controlled in order to eliminate the potential pathological damage resulting from unchecked receptor signaling (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 -24 Trypsin activates PAR1 and PAR2, but also disarms PAR1. 2,[25][26][27][28] Plasmin either activates or disarms PAR1, 6,29,30 whereas it inactivates PAR2 and activates PAR4. 31,32 The activated protein C (APC) has been shown to activate PAR1 and PAR2, [33][34][35] although its functional role still remains controversial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%