2020
DOI: 10.1080/02564602.2020.1819889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma Waves Around Venus and Mars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of zero flows, the electric field amplitude drops to the range of (∼7.63-11.52 mV/m). The estimated electric field values where the streaming effect is excluded and the observed electric fields in the Venusian ionosphere by PVO are in agreement [19]. Also we found that greatest electric field amplitude corresponds to the lowest altitude for both cases.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In case of zero flows, the electric field amplitude drops to the range of (∼7.63-11.52 mV/m). The estimated electric field values where the streaming effect is excluded and the observed electric fields in the Venusian ionosphere by PVO are in agreement [19]. Also we found that greatest electric field amplitude corresponds to the lowest altitude for both cases.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…IAW is one of the plasma modes observed in the Venusian environment. Many modes are also detected, such as ion cyclotron waves, Alfvenic waves, electron acoustic waves, whistler, and mirror modes [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Extensive work is devoted to interpret the different observed plasma phenomena at the Venusian environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly the rate of escape of the ions in the Venusian ionosphere, estimated by the various authors [45][46][47] based on the observations by ASPERA-4 and in distinct energy spectra are quite similar in their form and is in tune with this present investigation. It may be also possible that some shock like nonlinear resonant mechanisms can accelerate the process [48][49][50][51][52]…”
Section: An Possible Way Of the Particle Escape Processsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Thus, the Doppler shifted frequencies corresponding to the peaks in the power spectra in the plasma rest frame compare well with the PVO observations of ion-acoustic waves with frequencies 5.4 kHz. The ion-acoustic solitons that are predicted by our model can explain the PVO observation of ion-acoustic waves in the frequency range of 100 Hz, 730 Hz, and 5.4 kHz (Scarf et al 1979;Strangeway 1991;Yadav 2020) with an electric field amplitude of 10 −1 -10 −2 mV m −1 . In addition, the model (see the H + ion-mode in Tables 2 and 3) can be relevant in explaining the Solar Orbiter observation of ESWs with a peakto-peak electric field amplitude of a few mV m −1 with a characteristic timescale of ∼0.5 ms in the magnetosheath region (Hadid et al 2021).…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The magnetosheath region between the shock and the ionopause comprises thermalized subsonic solar wind plasma, which is associated with piled-up and draped IMF (Futaana et al 2017). The dynamics of Venus's induced magnetosphere rely to a large extent on the solar activity (Zhang et al 2007;Yadav 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%