2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2016.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma q-profile control in tokamaks using a damping assignment passivity-based approach

Abstract: International audienceThe IDA-PBC based on PCH model for tokamak q-profile is investigated. Two scenarios are carried out. The first one is the resistive diffusion model for the magnetic poloidal flux. The second one is extended with the thermal diffusion. A feedforward control is used to ensure the compatibility with the actuator physical ability. An IDA-PBC feedback is proposed to improve the system stabilization and convergence speed. The controllers are validated in the simulation using RAPTOR code and tes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the first version of the system, with generic controllers and a preliminary actuator manager, RT integrated control of NTMs, β and model-estimated q profiles has been demonstrated on TCV. The details of various β and q profile controllers have been presented in references [23][24][25], and here we only concentrate on the generic NTM controller. As shown in figure 21 and preliminarily presented in reference [26], three EC launchers (L1, L4 and L6) are used to perform the three control tasks.…”
Section: Rt Integrated Control Of Ntms β and Model-estimated Q Profimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the first version of the system, with generic controllers and a preliminary actuator manager, RT integrated control of NTMs, β and model-estimated q profiles has been demonstrated on TCV. The details of various β and q profile controllers have been presented in references [23][24][25], and here we only concentrate on the generic NTM controller. As shown in figure 21 and preliminarily presented in reference [26], three EC launchers (L1, L4 and L6) are used to perform the three control tasks.…”
Section: Rt Integrated Control Of Ntms β and Model-estimated Q Profimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13is indicated in each frame. 5 • 10 19 m −3 and the plasma current varies between 0.6 MA and 1.2 MA depending on the values of the heating and current drive actuators. The simulations were divided into several groups presented on Table 1.…”
Section: Identification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of the poloidal magnetic flux profile can be represented by a resistive diffusion, a parabolic equation with spatially distributed rapidly time-varying coefficients. Model-based methods for feedback control of the safety factor profile (also called the q-profile) using Multiple-Input and Multiple-Output (MIMO) finite dimensional systems are developed in [2,3,4,5], and using control algorithms based on infinite dimensional control theory are developed in [6,7,8,9]. The poloidal magnetic flux and the electron temperature are known to be highly coupled [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The q changes are rather small owing to the long global current redistribution time for JET discharges at these temperatures (typically ∼ 10s). The values of H 98 are (0.796, 0.7560.755) at t = [1,3,5] respectively.…”
Section: Nbi Input Power Scan Including Core-pedestal Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%