2013
DOI: 10.1002/ppap.201370013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma Process. Polym. 5/2013

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[28,29] Creating surface roughness on the polymers is one of the most popular solutions to enhance the hydrophobicity, but often involves nanoparticles [30][31][32] or requires elaborate protocols like lithography, chemical etching, or plasma treatment. [33][34][35][36][37][38] In our previous study of superhydrophobic xerogel coatings made from (±)-N,N'-(trans-cyclohexane-1,2-diyl)-bis(perfluorooctanamide) (CF7), [39][40][41] we found the coating to be quite resistant to intense water flows, since after five cycles of flushing 4 L of deionized water to the xerogel over a minute, the water contact angle (WCA) values hardly decreased (from 153°± 3°to 150°± 6°). However, gravimetric analyses indicated a loss of around 13% of the deposited material after these five flushing cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[28,29] Creating surface roughness on the polymers is one of the most popular solutions to enhance the hydrophobicity, but often involves nanoparticles [30][31][32] or requires elaborate protocols like lithography, chemical etching, or plasma treatment. [33][34][35][36][37][38] In our previous study of superhydrophobic xerogel coatings made from (±)-N,N'-(trans-cyclohexane-1,2-diyl)-bis(perfluorooctanamide) (CF7), [39][40][41] we found the coating to be quite resistant to intense water flows, since after five cycles of flushing 4 L of deionized water to the xerogel over a minute, the water contact angle (WCA) values hardly decreased (from 153°± 3°to 150°± 6°). However, gravimetric analyses indicated a loss of around 13% of the deposited material after these five flushing cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 28,29 ] Creating surface roughness on the polymers is one of the most popular solutions to enhance the hydrophobicity, but often involves nanoparticles [ 30–32 ] or requires elaborate protocols like lithography, chemical etching, or plasma treatment. [ 33–38 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%