2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma modification of PET foils with different crystallinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, OSTE‐80 polymer consisted of homogeneous amorphous phase which smoothened after plasma treatment though the absolute reduction was less than 1 nm. Similar results on polymers of different crystallinity have been reported by others; plasma‐treated amorphous polymer produced a smoother surface than the polymer with higher crystallinity . Unlike PUMA polymer, the change in water contact angle for OSTE‐80 polymer could only be attributed to the chemical changes which will be discussed next.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…On the other hand, OSTE‐80 polymer consisted of homogeneous amorphous phase which smoothened after plasma treatment though the absolute reduction was less than 1 nm. Similar results on polymers of different crystallinity have been reported by others; plasma‐treated amorphous polymer produced a smoother surface than the polymer with higher crystallinity . Unlike PUMA polymer, the change in water contact angle for OSTE‐80 polymer could only be attributed to the chemical changes which will be discussed next.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Also comparing the roughness values in the Table 2 with the data in the Table 1 and it can be concluded that the polymer roughness scales with the discharge power per unit area. However, based on the literature data [38][39][40] even though there was a change in the roughness values after plasma Fig. 9.…”
Section: Roughness Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [33,34]) observed changes in morphology of plasma treated polymers are most likely connected with differences in the etching rates of amorphous and crystalline regions.…”
Section: Surface Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%