Plasma formation in holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy

Pishchalnikov, Yuri A.; Behnke-Parks, William M.; Stoller, Marshall L.

doi:10.1002/lsm.23659

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

(51 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Notably, exposing COM stones to a high E P setting (0.8 J/12 Hz) resulted in more frequent spark emissions. These sparks could originate from plasma formation due to enhanced laser absorption [32] or from the interaction between stone debris and laser light within cavitation bubbles. Following the sparks, occasional larger stone fragments were observed, potentially resulting from microexplosions in the stone material or shockwaves due to laser-induced cavitation bubble collapse.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring optimal settings for safe and effective thulium fibre laser lithotripsy in a kidney model

Mishra,

Medairos,

Chen

et al. 2023

BJU International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo explore the optimal laser settings and treatment strategies for thulium fibre laser (TFL) lithotripsy, namely, those with the highest treatment efficiency, lowest thermal injury risk, and shortest procedure time.Materials and MethodsAn in vitro kidney model was used to assess the efficacy of TFL lithotripsy in the upper calyx. Stone ablation experiments were performed on BegoStone phantoms at different combinations of pulse energy (EP) and frequency (F) to determine the optimal settings. Temperature changes and thermal injury risks were monitored using embedded thermocouples. Experiments were also performed on calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones to validate the optimal settings.ResultsHigh EP/low F settings demonstrated superior treatment efficiency compared to low EP/high F settings using the same power. Specifically, 0.8 J/12 Hz was the optimal setting, resulting in a twofold increase in treatment efficiency, a 39% reduction in energy expenditure per unit of ablated stone mass, a 35% reduction in residual fragments, and a 36% reduction in total procedure time compared to the 0.2 J/50 Hz setting for COM stones. Thermal injury risk assessment indicated that 10 W power settings with high EP/low F combinations remained below the threshold for tissue injury, while higher power settings (>10 W) consistently exceeded the safety threshold.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that high EP/low F settings, such as 0.8 J/12 Hz, are optimal for TFL lithotripsy in the treatment of COM stones. These settings demonstrated significantly improved treatment efficiency with reduced residual fragments compared to conventional settings while keeping the thermal dose below the injury threshold. This study highlights the importance of using the high EP/low F combination with low power settings, which maximizes treatment efficiency and minimizes potential thermal injury. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal settings for TFL for treating kidney stones with different compositions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%