1986
DOI: 10.1016/0049-3848(86)90158-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma fibronectin levels in normal subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Densitometric analysis of the signal showed that the ratio between the test and control lines was proportional to the log of Fn (analyte) concentration ( Figures 6B,C ) over a range of concentrations between 0.625 and 10 ng/μL, consistent with simple visual comparison of control band density. These are much lower concentrations of Fn than those measured in the serum of healthy individuals (259–400 ng/μL; Allard et al, 1986 ). A suitable serum dilution would therefore adjust the concentration to the quantitative detection range of the assay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Densitometric analysis of the signal showed that the ratio between the test and control lines was proportional to the log of Fn (analyte) concentration ( Figures 6B,C ) over a range of concentrations between 0.625 and 10 ng/μL, consistent with simple visual comparison of control band density. These are much lower concentrations of Fn than those measured in the serum of healthy individuals (259–400 ng/μL; Allard et al, 1986 ). A suitable serum dilution would therefore adjust the concentration to the quantitative detection range of the assay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…6B) indicated a second order polynomial dependence between the signal intensity at the test line and analyte concentration over a range of concentrations between 1.25 ng/μL and 10 ng/μL. Concentration of Fn in the serum of healthy individuals is 259-400 ng/μL (Allard et al, 1986), Furthermore, variations of Fn concentration in disease are also within the range of quantitative detection of this assay (Choate and Mosher, 1983;Cembrowski and Mosher, 1984;Weller et al, 1988;Honest et al, 2002;Mosher, 2006;Eissa et al, 2010). Hence, suitably diluted samples of healthy and affected individuals can be quantitatively determined using this assay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%