1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92193-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma Exchange in the Management of Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolæmia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0
4

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 352 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
96
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar effects were noted in patient 2 except that the posttreatment cholesterol levels never reached the pretreatment value throughout the study. This difference may be attributed to the additional beneficiary effect of hypolipidemic drugs in this patient as also previously reported by Thompson et al (24,25).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Similar effects were noted in patient 2 except that the posttreatment cholesterol levels never reached the pretreatment value throughout the study. This difference may be attributed to the additional beneficiary effect of hypolipidemic drugs in this patient as also previously reported by Thompson et al (24,25).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Some studies have reported that LDL apheresis therapy was safe in children without influencing development/growth, and that this therapy led to the reduction/disappearance of skin xanthoma, inhibiting exacerbation of aortic valve stenosis/supravalvular stenosis, which are characteristic of homozygous FH, and coronary lesions, or resulting in improvement [73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80] . Irondeficiency anemia is the most frequent side effect.…”
Section: Effects Of Ldl Apheresismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the young female patient groups, those with angina pectoris or myocardial ischemia showed significantly higher CSI than those without symptoms and signs (p<0.05) ( Figure 2D). Midpoint and standard deviation of CSI in five age groups (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-70 years) were shown in Figure 3. As might be predicted from the regression equations in Figures 2D and 3 Figure 2D).…”
Section: Coronary Angiographic Studymentioning
confidence: 99%