1977
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/17/4/015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma containment in cusp-shaped magnetic fields

Abstract: Advances in the subject of plasma containment in cusp-shaped magnetic fields over the past six or more years are reviewed. Particular emphasis is placed on the structure and thickness of the sheath separating a field-free plasma from a vacuum magnetic field. Recent experimental results suggest possibly that the thickness could be the geometric mean of the electron and ion Larmor radii, compared to earlier results in which the thickness measured was nearer the ion Larmor radius. The electric field in the sheath… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This leak width varies inversely with B (see, e.g., HAINES [13]). In this case the effect of the magnetic field on plasma Confinement is analogous, in the field-free case, t o the role of neutral pressure on plasma production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leak width varies inversely with B (see, e.g., HAINES [13]). In this case the effect of the magnetic field on plasma Confinement is analogous, in the field-free case, t o the role of neutral pressure on plasma production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This configuration occurs whenever a field free plasma penetrates into a magnetic field, and is known in the controlled-fusion literature as a "cusp". Cuspy configurations like the "stellarator" and the "picket fence" play a role as alternatives to the Tokamak configuration, because of their inherent MHD-stability (e.g., Rose & Clark 1961;Artsymovich 1964;Haines 1977). Consider first the simple case B y = 0 and, without loss of generality, ignore the gas pressure inside the magnetic region.…”
Section: Cuspsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the above mentioned qualitative result, can we quantify the change of the growth rate due to a change on the perturbative wavelength? To answer this question, first we observe that the product ∆ a, in the general equation (35), is a function of the product ka [45][46][47][48][49]. Perhaps, the most illustrative example of this issue is provided by the so-called Harris model, which assumes the profile [50] …”
Section: Growth Rate Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%