2010
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Causing Light Chain Tubulopathy Without Fanconi Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this previous study, the diagnosis of malignant plasma cells could not be established for some patients at the time of renal biopsy, although the patients were diagnosed later in a follow-up study with the gradual emergence of corresponding clinical manifestations (10). In contrast, it is very rare to present large quantities of crystalline inclu- sions deposited in podocytes and only 10 cases have been reported to date (2,5,6,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) (Table). Therefore, the present case, which was identified via electron microscopy, represents the 11th case reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this previous study, the diagnosis of malignant plasma cells could not be established for some patients at the time of renal biopsy, although the patients were diagnosed later in a follow-up study with the gradual emergence of corresponding clinical manifestations (10). In contrast, it is very rare to present large quantities of crystalline inclu- sions deposited in podocytes and only 10 cases have been reported to date (2,5,6,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) (Table). Therefore, the present case, which was identified via electron microscopy, represents the 11th case reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[4][5][6][7][8]15,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] In these cases, 53/56 showed the presence of intracytoplasmic crystals in the proximal tubular cells and 37/40 proved to be of the k subtype. The three previous cases without crystal formation were all reported by Kapur et al 5 in one paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We at first assumed that monoclonal BJP-j was the real offender in inducing FS, but careful pathohistological observations did not reveal any evidence of light chain renal involvement. In fact, 'crystalline-like structures' in cytoplasm of proximal tubules are not always detected in cases of monoclonal gammopathy accompanied by 'light chain-induced tubulopathy (including FS)' [13,14], conversely, FS is not always occurred even 'crystalline-like structures' were detected [15], therefore, we cannot conclude simply relying on only pathohistological information. However, steady and gradual reduction of both total urinary protein (including albumin) and M-peak fraction were observed, which strongly support the notion that FS might have been maintained by adefovir administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%