2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma cancer biomarker multiplex screening and the risk of subsequent preeclampsia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the disturbed endothelial cell function in placental tissue in severe PE cases, the regulation of this imbalance may be not possible and it may explain the lower FGF2 serum concentrations observed in women with severe PE Hohlagschwandtner et al, 2002). The relationship between the circulating FGF2 concentration and PE development has been reported in other studies, in which a decrease in FGF2 plasma concentrations was observed at 16 WG in pregnant women who subsequently developed PE when they were compared with women with normotensive pregnancies (Martinez-Fierro et al, 2015;Martinez-Fierro et al, 2018b). Based on the above, we inferred that low FGF2 circulating concentrations could be due to the poor response of the FGF2 regulatory mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, due to the disturbed endothelial cell function in placental tissue in severe PE cases, the regulation of this imbalance may be not possible and it may explain the lower FGF2 serum concentrations observed in women with severe PE Hohlagschwandtner et al, 2002). The relationship between the circulating FGF2 concentration and PE development has been reported in other studies, in which a decrease in FGF2 plasma concentrations was observed at 16 WG in pregnant women who subsequently developed PE when they were compared with women with normotensive pregnancies (Martinez-Fierro et al, 2015;Martinez-Fierro et al, 2018b). Based on the above, we inferred that low FGF2 circulating concentrations could be due to the poor response of the FGF2 regulatory mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Abnormal trophoblast implantation is tightly related to the proliferative and invasive capacities of trophoblastic cells [ 20 ]. Considering the molecular mechanisms involved during implantation, recent evidence suggests common links between PE and cancer progression pathways [ 20 , 27 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abnormal trophoblast implantation is tightly related to the proliferative and invasive capacities of trophoblastic cells [ 20 ]. Considering the molecular mechanisms involved during implantation, recent evidence suggests common links between PE and cancer progression pathways [ 20 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. In agreement with these reports and with the findings regarding circulating PE-modulated members of the C19MC cluster (some of which are cancer-related) [ 30 ], the signaling pathways modeling results showed that in addition to cancer-related KEGG pathways, Wnt, MAPK, PI3K-Akt, ErbB, GnRH, VEGF, B/T cell receptors, and ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis signaling pathways, were the most commonly modulated by the miRNAs altered in WWD-PE in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In PE, several researchers have investigated the utility of clinical variables, maternal characteristics, and biophysical and biochemical markers obtained early during gestation, to develop models for predicting PE (occurrence and severity). [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84] The variables that have been modeled include maternal age, body mass index (BMI), height, parity, blood pressure, hematocrit count, smoking, previous miscarriage, family history of high blood pressure, ultrasound variables such as mean arterial pressure (MAP) and uterine artery pulsatility index (PI), [85][86][87][88] first-trimester urine and serum metabolomic profiles, 89 and biochemical markers such as maternal plasma or serum levels of placental protein-13, PGF, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, P-selectin, pentraxin-3, activin-A, inhibin-A, and sENG. 90 The prediction efficacy of each model may be compared considering the specificity and sensitivity values and/or with the area under the curve.…”
Section: Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%