2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plaque-neutralizing antibody to BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 in individuals with three doses of BioNTech or CoronaVac vaccines, natural infection and breakthrough infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The booster consisting of a heterologous mRNA and viral vector vaccine showed a higher seropositivity rate of neutralizing activity against BA.4/5, while the BBIBP booster achieved only 20% seropositivity. Similar to the study of three-dose CoronaVac and two-dose CoronaVac plus BNT162b2, the seropositive number of Plaque neutralizing antibody (PRNT50) against BA.4 and BA.5 was only 10% in homologous three-dose CoronaVac compared to 90–100% in a heterologous booster (Cheng et al, 2022). The results showed that the NAbs induced by heterologous mRNA and viral vector as a third dose vaccination had broad neutralizing activity against several subvariants of SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The booster consisting of a heterologous mRNA and viral vector vaccine showed a higher seropositivity rate of neutralizing activity against BA.4/5, while the BBIBP booster achieved only 20% seropositivity. Similar to the study of three-dose CoronaVac and two-dose CoronaVac plus BNT162b2, the seropositive number of Plaque neutralizing antibody (PRNT50) against BA.4 and BA.5 was only 10% in homologous three-dose CoronaVac compared to 90–100% in a heterologous booster (Cheng et al, 2022). The results showed that the NAbs induced by heterologous mRNA and viral vector as a third dose vaccination had broad neutralizing activity against several subvariants of SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The limited cross-variant neutralization elicited by Omicron primary infection in humans or Omicron-based vaccination of immunologically naïve animals and the data on the specificity of memory B cells presented here indicate that an Omicron-based vaccine might elicit antibody responses directed toward the vaccine-matched and closely related antigens. This suggests that a heterologous prime boost or a multivalent approach might be preferable ( 59 , 66 73 ). Omicron infection and Omicron S-based vaccination of previously immune subjects, however, recalls cross-reactive memory B cells ( 58 , 74 ), which may further mature over time to enhance their affinity and neutralizing potency against Omicron, but also to possibly broaden their neutralizing activity against past and future variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, another immunological study has found that BA.4 and BA.5 were less susceptible than BA.1 and BA.2 to vaccine elicited antibody neutralization (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with a small immunological study with repeated collection of sera and nasal swabs in 27 individuals that showed that infection, but not vaccination, triggered detectable local response against SARS-CoV-2 in the nasal mucosa (11). Furthermore, another immunological study has found that BA.4 and BA.5 were less susceptible than BA.1 and BA.2 to vaccine elicited antibody neutralization (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%