Plaque Characterization with Computed Tomography Angiography Based on a Diluted-contrast Injection Protocol

Abstract

Objective Coronary plaques with low attenuation on computed tomography (CT) angiography may indicate vulnerable plaques. However, plaque CT attenuation is reported to be significantly affected by intracoronary attenuation. Recently, the diluted-contrast injection protocol was established to facilitate more uniform intracoronary attenuation than can be achieved with the generally used body-weight-adjusted protocol. We validated the relationship between low-attenuation plaque on CT and lipid-rich plaque using integrated backscatter-intravascular ultrasound (IB-IVUS) as the standard reference. Methods Plaques were divided into tertiles (T1, T2, and T3) according to the plaque CT attenuation, calculated as the average of five intra-plaque regions of interest, and compared with the plaque characteristics noted on IB-IVUS. Patients Patients who underwent both CT angiography using a diluted-contrast injection protocol and IB-IVUS were retrospectively analyzed. Results Thirty-nine plaques in 32 patients were analyzed by CT angiography and IB-IVUS. The median plaque CT attenuation (Hounsfield units) of each tertile was 30 (T1), 48 (T2), and 68 (T3). Although no significant difference was noted in conventional quantitative IVUS parameters (e.g. plaque burden), the T1 with lowest plaque CT attenuation had the highest percentage lipid area by IB-IVUS [75.1% (T1), 57.8% (T2), and 50.8% (T3), respectively, p<0.01]. Furthermore, the plaque CT attenuation had a significant negative correlation with the percentage lipid area (r=-0.59, p<0.01). Conclusion CT angiography-based plaque characterization using a diluted-contrast injection protocol may aid in the quantitative detection of lipid-rich plaque.

Microstructural and mechanical insight into atherosclerotic plaques: an ex vivo DTI study to better assess plaque vulnerability

“…Additionally, optical coherence tomography has been identified as an invasive imaging modality which can identify plaque features (Yabushita et al 2002 ; Subban and Raffel 2020 ), whereas optical coherence elastography has the potential to identify regions of high strain (Soest et al 2017 ). In vivo computed tomography has also been used to classify plaques (Nakao et al 2021 ), while ex vivo studies using micro-computed tomography have looked at the mechanical properties around calcified and non-calcified atherosclerotic tissue (Cahalane et al 2018 ; Cahalane and Walsh 2021 ). In comparison to ultrasound, computed tomography and optical coherence tomography, MRI is both non-ionising and offers unparalleled soft tissue contrast.…”