2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plaque Characteristics in Culprit Lesions and Inflammatory Status in Diabetic Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

Abstract: Diabetic patients with ACS have more plaques with characteristics of plaque vulnerability, different composition of plaques, and have increased inflammatory status compared with nondiabetic patients with ACS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, poorly controlled DM is associated with a greater lipid burden 18. Intravascular ultrasound studies have shown that patients with DM and ACS have greater plaque burden and necrotic core volume at the culprit lesions compared with patients with ACS but not DM 20, 21. In contrast, previous OCT studies did not demonstrate the differences in the prevalence of lipid‐rich plaque or TCFA at the culprit lesion 6, 8, 22, 23.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, poorly controlled DM is associated with a greater lipid burden 18. Intravascular ultrasound studies have shown that patients with DM and ACS have greater plaque burden and necrotic core volume at the culprit lesions compared with patients with ACS but not DM 20, 21. In contrast, previous OCT studies did not demonstrate the differences in the prevalence of lipid‐rich plaque or TCFA at the culprit lesion 6, 8, 22, 23.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4 It has been shown that diabetic patients have more plaques, which appeared to have characteristics of plaque vulnerability and a different composition of plaques than nondiabetic patients for those presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). 5 Diabetic patients have more triple-vessel and less single-vessel CAD than nondiabetics. 6 The aim of this study was to assess the plaque characteristics in …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Others have reported the usefulness of volumetric VH-IVUS analysis using more many frames per entire target lesion. 26 In contrast, the methodology of frame analysis to identify TCFA in iMap-IVUS analysis has not been established, because iMap-IVUS and pathological findings have not been fully validated. In addition, volume analysis is difficult to apply in the clinical setting because it is time-consuming, labor intensive and requires specialist training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%