2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.11.17.516924
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PlantTribes2: tools for comparative gene family analysis in plant genomics

Abstract: Plant genome-scale resources are being generated at an increasing rate as sequencing technologies continue to improve and raw data costs continue to fall; however, the cost of downstream analyses remains large. This has resulted in a considerable range of genome assembly and annotation qualities across plant genomes due to their varying sizes, complexity, and the technology used for the assembly and annotation. To effectively work across genomes, researchers increasingly rely on comparative genomic approaches … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.9.1 Criteria for gene selection. The top 45 genes identified as being predictive of texture loss from the RF regression model were selected and classified into orthogroups pre-computed with the 26Gv2.0 scaffold using PlantTribes2 [51]. Orthogroup multiple sequence alignment, phylogenetic tree estimation, homology inference, and gene model evaluation were performed using genes from 16 Rosaceae genomes (the same 15 from [52] plus Malus baccata [53]) plus the scaffolding species following methods from [52].…”
Section: Gene Of Interest Selection For Qpcr Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.9.1 Criteria for gene selection. The top 45 genes identified as being predictive of texture loss from the RF regression model were selected and classified into orthogroups pre-computed with the 26Gv2.0 scaffold using PlantTribes2 [51]. Orthogroup multiple sequence alignment, phylogenetic tree estimation, homology inference, and gene model evaluation were performed using genes from 16 Rosaceae genomes (the same 15 from [52] plus Malus baccata [53]) plus the scaffolding species following methods from [52].…”
Section: Gene Of Interest Selection For Qpcr Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of standardized nomenclature for plant genomes represents a significant advancement in the field of plant genomics as it helps reduce confusion and potential errors, thereby enhancing the reliability and reproducibility of genomic research. In addition, we followed a previouslyestablished gene family classification protocol (Wafula et al 2022;Khan et al 2022) that circumscribed genes into pre-computed orthogroups. Such a practice not only reduces computational resource requirements, but also allows researchers to more easily compare findings across studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Core OrthoGroup (CROG) -Rosaceae gene count analysis was carried out following the method described by (Wafula et al 2022). First, a CROG gene count matrix was created by counting genes classified into CROGs from each pome fruit genome.…”
Section: Gene Family Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations