2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PlantscRNAdb: A database for plant single-cell RNA analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Single-cell sequencing has ushered in a new era of biology where it is possible to characterize cell types and function with unprecedented detail. In plants, this has resulted in detailed single-cell RNA-seq and Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin (scATAC-seq) datasets primarily on different organ types from well-studied model organisms ( Denyer et al, 2019 ; Ryu et al, 2019 ; Dorrity et al, 2021 ; Gujas et al, 2020 ; Marand et al, 2020 ; Song et al, 2020 ; Liu et al, 2020a , 2020b ; Chen et al, 2021 ; Lopez-Anido et al, 2021 ; Xu et al, 2021 ). Most plant studies to date start with protoplast isolation, which has the potential to miss some recalcitrant cell types and often require correction to control for transcriptional changes elicited by lengthy enzyme treatment and centrifugation steps ( Ryu et al, 2019 ; Cuperus, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-cell sequencing has ushered in a new era of biology where it is possible to characterize cell types and function with unprecedented detail. In plants, this has resulted in detailed single-cell RNA-seq and Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin (scATAC-seq) datasets primarily on different organ types from well-studied model organisms ( Denyer et al, 2019 ; Ryu et al, 2019 ; Dorrity et al, 2021 ; Gujas et al, 2020 ; Marand et al, 2020 ; Song et al, 2020 ; Liu et al, 2020a , 2020b ; Chen et al, 2021 ; Lopez-Anido et al, 2021 ; Xu et al, 2021 ). Most plant studies to date start with protoplast isolation, which has the potential to miss some recalcitrant cell types and often require correction to control for transcriptional changes elicited by lengthy enzyme treatment and centrifugation steps ( Ryu et al, 2019 ; Cuperus, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we compared SIM0 scRNA-seq data with the previously reported scRNA-seq data obtained from root 38 and shoot apex 29 , respectively. We found that there were 2,623 and 2,632 genes up-regulated in callus compared with root and shoot apex, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell identity scores were calculated using Hypergeometric Distribution Enrichment Analysis (HDEA). Specifically, the root cell type-specific markers from the online database 38 and the leaf cell type-specific markers from Arabidopsis shoot apex 29 were used as reference (Supplementary Table 2). The cluster-specific markers were calculated using Seurat “FindAllMarkers” function log-fold change >= 0.25, present in >= 25% cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…scRNA-seq has been used by plant scientists since 2013 and related publications have dramatically increased recently due to the advent of droplet-based scRNA-seq technologies (Chen et al, 2021). While the increasing number of scRNA-seq studies has advanced our knowledge about plant cell heterogeneity, mining public data is challenging for researchers with limited computational expertise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%