2012
DOI: 10.2478/v10098-012-0027-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plants and biological soil crust influence the hydrophysical parameters and water flow in an aeolian sandy soil / Vplyv rastlín a biologického pôdneho pokryvu na hydrofyzikálne parametre a prúdenie vody v piesočnatej pôde

Abstract: This study tested the hypothesis that the changes in hydrophysical parameters and heterogeneity of water flow in an aeolian sandy soil have the same trend as the process of succession. Three sub-sites were demarcated at the area of about 50 m x 50 m. The first sub-site was located at the pine-forest glade covered with a biological soil crust and represented the initial stage of succession. The second sub-site was located at the grassland and represented more advanced stage of succession. The third sub-site was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the thickness and the water repellency of moss (Tables 1 and 4) were significantly greater than those of cyanobacteria, which produced stronger water infiltration blockage Li, Tian, Jia, Zhang, & Liu, 2010;Lichner et al, 2012Lichner et al, , 2013Yang et al, 2016). The differences in the effects of cyanobacteria and moss crusts on soil hydraulic properties in this study are consistent with the results of previous studies (Eldridge et al, 2000;Graetz & Tongway, 1986;Li et al, 2002;Lichner et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2007;.…”
Section: Variations Of Hydraulic Parameters Under Different Crust Csupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, the thickness and the water repellency of moss (Tables 1 and 4) were significantly greater than those of cyanobacteria, which produced stronger water infiltration blockage Li, Tian, Jia, Zhang, & Liu, 2010;Lichner et al, 2012Lichner et al, , 2013Yang et al, 2016). The differences in the effects of cyanobacteria and moss crusts on soil hydraulic properties in this study are consistent with the results of previous studies (Eldridge et al, 2000;Graetz & Tongway, 1986;Li et al, 2002;Lichner et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2007;.…”
Section: Variations Of Hydraulic Parameters Under Different Crust Csupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Meanwhile, the water repellency of cyanobacteria and moss crusts are approximately 6.84 and 16.04 times higher, respectively, than those of bare soils (Table 4). thus reducing the soil infiltration (Bu et al, 2013;Lichner et al, 2012). Moss is more effective in reducing the soil infiltration capacity than cyanobacteria, which is caused by the difference in the properties of cyanobacteria and moss, as will be discussed later.…”
Section: Variations Of Hydraulic Parameters Under Different Crust Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations