2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant-wide assessment of alternative activated sludge configurations for biological nutrient removal under uncertain influent characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, reliability has been determined by leveraging influent and effluent data (i.e., without modeling the AS process), through statistical concepts like coefficients of variations and associated percentiles (Oliveira & Von Sperling, 2008), or using probabilistic approaches like fault tree analysis (Taheriyoun & Moradinejad, 2015). Meanwhile, Ramin et al (2022) conducted a reliability analysis to determine the compliance with effluent limits of several nutrient removal WWTPs (i.e., focused on nitrification/denitrification and enhanced biological phosphorus removal) for different plant layouts. Additionally, the previous authors conducted a global sensitivity analysis on the concentration of nutrients in the effluent and other key performance indicators but did not determine sensitivity indices on reliability metrics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, reliability has been determined by leveraging influent and effluent data (i.e., without modeling the AS process), through statistical concepts like coefficients of variations and associated percentiles (Oliveira & Von Sperling, 2008), or using probabilistic approaches like fault tree analysis (Taheriyoun & Moradinejad, 2015). Meanwhile, Ramin et al (2022) conducted a reliability analysis to determine the compliance with effluent limits of several nutrient removal WWTPs (i.e., focused on nitrification/denitrification and enhanced biological phosphorus removal) for different plant layouts. Additionally, the previous authors conducted a global sensitivity analysis on the concentration of nutrients in the effluent and other key performance indicators but did not determine sensitivity indices on reliability metrics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a comprehensive global sensitivy analysis (GSA) should be carried out in order to study the influent of process parameters [52]. In such complex systems so highly parameterized, these types of analysis can really help to disentangle the interactions between the treatment units comprising the flow diagram [47]. Nevertheless, such study could be considered a new paper on its own.Yet, some degree of extrapolation could be made based on [55] and Solon et al, 2013 A calibrated model, able to predict volumetric and mass flows in a plant-wide fashion, can be useful to evaluate alternative process layouts and its impact in overall performance of the waste treatment system, economics, environmental impact, etc.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%