Plant Systematics in the Age of Genomics

Abstract

As plant biologists enter a new era in which comparative genomics promises to address fundamental questions in botany, such as unraveling metabolic and regulatory networks, the inestimable value and usefulness of robust systematic studies quickly become clear. In simplest terms, systematic studies can indicate which genomes in the plant kingdom to search, sample, and study for the answers to questions relating to the evolution of chemical and physical structures and their synthesis or ontogeny. After several model and crop species have been sequenced, the next phase of plant genomics will necessarily build on new phylogenies that are greatly assisted by molecular techniques and whose interpretation and applications will be guided by "traditional" botanical knowledge.Plant systematics was long considered to be an "artful science," but well before the application of molecular techniques to systematics, semisubjective authority was supplanted by rapidly developing analytical methods and the computers that run them. In the age of genomics, the art of modern plant systematics lies in its applications and its links to other disciplines; conversely, the applications of genomics to an expanding array of plant species will be grounded in plant systematics, itself still based largely on field work and knowing the plants.Much is new-and much is not-for plant systematics in the age of genomics. Molecular techniques have introduced vast and numerous independent data sets, and there are continual advances in preparing DNA, sequencing genes, aligning sequences, and designing software for interpreting the data. As a consequence of this increased accessibility, mainstream plant systematics has been able to incorporate molecular approaches, which no longer occupy a separate domain but rather constitute part of the normal repertoire of skills for systematic botanists.The special usefulness of molecular approaches in analyzing phylogenetic relationships at higher ranks has resulted in still unresolved but clearly better and dramatically new classifications, discussed below. These developments, coupled with other advances in phylogenetic analysis, now place systematics in a key position among other disciplines in biology, with increasingly diverse and powerful applications in investigations of biosynthetic and developmental pathways, natural products, origins and migrations of evolutionary lineages, and conservation. Whether it occupies the hub or spokes, more than ever plant systematics is needed to make the genomics wheel roll.The biggest non-news is that molecular techniques have in fact not revolutionized methodologies in systematics. Instead, molecular data have rather rapidly been accommodated in existing analytical methods whose revolution-cladistics-had come and for some time had been the new order (Schuh, 2000). Once computers could be harnessed to execute complex pattern analysis and resample data thousands of times for statistical rigor, phylogenetic systematics or cladistics had overruled the authority represented by a f...

Tests of Taxonomic and Biogeographic Predictivity: Resistance to Disease and Insect Pests in Wild Relatives of Cultivated Potato

“…A widely held assumption is that taxonomically related organisms, or those found in geographic proximity, are likely to share traits (Warburton, 1967;Daly et al, 2001;Spooner et al, 2003). This concept arises from knowledge that plant populations are not randomly arranged assemblages of genotypes but are structured in space, time, and history, resulting from the combined eff ects of mutation, migration, selection, and drift (Loveless and Hamrick, 1984).…”

“…Taxonomic associations to traits have been well documented (Daly et al, 2001), and there are many examples of associations of genetic distance to geographic distance such as in Chamaecytisus (Francisco‐Ortega et al, 1993), pistachio ( Pistacia vera L.) (Hormanza et al, 1994), Solanum sect. Etuberosum (Spooner et al, 1995), sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) (Cronn et al, 1997), lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.)…”

Taxonomy and Genetic Differentiation among Wild and Cultivated Germplasm of Solanum sect. Petota

“…Such genes offer candidates for breeders in selecting elite cultivars and have implications for the expression of important field traits. Understanding the taxonomy of wild relatives of cultivated crops is also important, as it increases the efficiency of germplasm conservation and may lend predictive power to the implementation of diverse plant species in breeding programs (Daly et al, 2001, Spooner and Salas, 2006).…”

A review of research on the cycad genus Ceratozamia Brongn. (Zamiaceae) in Mexico

“…With regard to secondary products, certain toxins are peculiar only to cycads, such as cycasin. Macrozamin and the neurotoxin 2-amino-3-(methylamino)-propanoic acid (BMAA) are considered synapomorphies of the cycad clade of the seed plants (Daly & al., 2001).…”