2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant species richness in the Chaco Serrano Woodland from central Argentina: Ecological traits and habitat fragmentation effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
62
1
12

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
62
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the landscape is highly fragmented with small, isolated remnants surrounded by a matrix of agricultural lands. The negative consequences of habitat fragmentation on plants and animals are numerous and have been studied extensively (e.g., Kruess and Tscharntke, 1994;Quinn, 2004;Wilsey et al, 2005;Benedick et al, 2006;Cagnolo et al, 2006). Because smaller fragments have a higher edge-to-area ratio than larger fragments (Webb, 1989;Kiviniemi and Eriksson, 2002;Benedick et al, 2006), they are more susceptible to invasion by non-native species (e.g., Kiviniemi and Eriksson, 2002;Hansen and Clevenger, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the landscape is highly fragmented with small, isolated remnants surrounded by a matrix of agricultural lands. The negative consequences of habitat fragmentation on plants and animals are numerous and have been studied extensively (e.g., Kruess and Tscharntke, 1994;Quinn, 2004;Wilsey et al, 2005;Benedick et al, 2006;Cagnolo et al, 2006). Because smaller fragments have a higher edge-to-area ratio than larger fragments (Webb, 1989;Kiviniemi and Eriksson, 2002;Benedick et al, 2006), they are more susceptible to invasion by non-native species (e.g., Kiviniemi and Eriksson, 2002;Hansen and Clevenger, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species-area relationship (SAR) hypothesises that smaller patches have a less heterogeneous environment, supporting fewer species (Gleason 1922(Gleason , 1925Williams 1943;MacArthur and Wilson 1967;Connor and McCoy 1979). Recent studies by Godefroid and Koedam (2003), Cagnolo et al (2006), Aparicio et al (2008), Brown and Boutin (2009), Gonzalez et al (2010) and Laurance et al (2011) have supported this relationship. Smaller, and therefore more isolated, patches are predicted to support smaller, genetically similar species populations that are vulnerable to localised extinction from disease, population decline and altered microclimatic conditions (Connor and McCoy 1979;Baldwin and Bradfield 2007;Shapcott et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The study area was formerly dominated by Aspidosperma quebrachoblanco and Schinopsis marginata subtropical seasonally dry forests [Sayago, 1969;Zak and Cabido, 2002]. Despite many outstanding features in terms of biodiversity values [Molina et al, 1999;Cagnolo et al, 2006;Torrella et al, 2013] and ecosystem services [Conti and Diaz, 2013;Cáceres, 2014], which make these complex ecosystems worthy of protection, the Gran Chaco, is one of the main deforestation areas of Latin America [Grau and Aide, 2008;Hansen et al, 2012]. During the last three decades the generalized expansion of agriculture [Zak et al, 2008;Hoyos et al, 2013], driven by global trends in technology and soybean markets [Grau et al, 2005], but also by global changes in the precipitation regimes [Hoyos et al, 2013], have promoted a sharp drop of the Gran Chaco natural forests.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%