2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant species diversity in alien black locust stands: A paired comparison with native stands across a north-Mediterranean range expansion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, black locust is a spontaneous species and shows a tendency to form pioneer forests. This situation raises biodiversity conservation issues regarding the future development of these habitats [58,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, black locust is a spontaneous species and shows a tendency to form pioneer forests. This situation raises biodiversity conservation issues regarding the future development of these habitats [58,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution range of R. pseudoacacia in the understory is closely related to planting history. Sitzia et al (2012) compared plant species diversity in alien black locust stands and native stands, found the presence of R. pseudoacacia did not play a major role in shaping the diversity of the understory plant species compared to native tree species. At present, R. pseudoacacia communities are widely distributed below 1000 m on Mount Tai and below 700 m on Mount Lao.…”
Section: The Characteristics Of Alien Plants In the Mountain Forest Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, however, afforestation has unexpected negative effects, such as plant invasion (Weber, 2003;Cierjacks et al, 2013), biodiversity impoverishment (Sitzia et al, 2012;Trentanovi et al, 2013), no positive effects on control of soil erosion , the issue of forest fires (Mataix-Solera et al, 2011;Pereira et al, 2015). It has been an intense matter of debate (Le Houerou, 2000;Cao et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%