2015
DOI: 10.3398/042.008.0102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Species Coalition Groups of Zion National Park: An Individualistic, Floristic Alternative to Vegetation Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, recognizing bryophyte elevation zones would be uncomfortably forced. The coalitions of RCLUS were better than vegetation types because RCLUS allows species to be individualistic (Ott et al 2015). The boundaries of the various species do not have to be coincident cartographically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, recognizing bryophyte elevation zones would be uncomfortably forced. The coalitions of RCLUS were better than vegetation types because RCLUS allows species to be individualistic (Ott et al 2015). The boundaries of the various species do not have to be coincident cartographically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coalitions based on co-occurrence at the plot level. For the Kaweah data set, RCLUS was used to search for coalitions of species (Ott et al 2015;Sanderson et al 2006). It is written as a macro in Excel 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%