2021
DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Single Cell Transcriptome Hub (PsctH): an integrated online tool to explore the plant single‐cell transcriptome landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, of the 6,836 cells that passed quality control, a total of 5,930 nuclei of high con dence represented their corresponding cells in the gene expression matrix (Table S2 and Figure S3-4). The integration of snRNA-seq and snATAC-seq resulted in the construction of 17 cell clusters in a coembedded 5,930 cell distribution UMAP (Figure 1C) based on previously reported cell markers (Figure 1D) and cluster correlation detection (Liu et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2021;Xu et al, 2022). These 17 clusters were further classi ed into different cell types, with clusters 0, 1, 3, 8, 11, and 12 representing mesophyll cells; clusters 2, 7, 10, and 15 classi ed as epidermal cells; guard cells were distributed in cluster 14.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, of the 6,836 cells that passed quality control, a total of 5,930 nuclei of high con dence represented their corresponding cells in the gene expression matrix (Table S2 and Figure S3-4). The integration of snRNA-seq and snATAC-seq resulted in the construction of 17 cell clusters in a coembedded 5,930 cell distribution UMAP (Figure 1C) based on previously reported cell markers (Figure 1D) and cluster correlation detection (Liu et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2021;Xu et al, 2022). These 17 clusters were further classi ed into different cell types, with clusters 0, 1, 3, 8, 11, and 12 representing mesophyll cells; clusters 2, 7, 10, and 15 classi ed as epidermal cells; guard cells were distributed in cluster 14.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The UMAP dimensionality reduction of the relative expression of cell matrix constructed a two-dimensional representation group of cells, 5930 leaf cells were divided into sixteen and ve cell clusters by only using the snRNA-seq and snATAC-seq data, respectively (Figure 1C-F). Furthermore, integration of snRNA-seq and snATAC-seq resulted in construction of 17 cell clusters in co-embed cell distribution map based on previous reported cell marker and cluster correlation detection (Liu et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2021;Xu et al, 2022). Interestingly, the clusters 0, 1, 3, 8, 11, and 12 represented the mesophyll cells, divided by RBCS and CAB3, and YAB1 transcript abundance, marker for spongy cell was enriched in cluster 8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, several databases have been developed to facilitate the use of sc in plant biology, including PlantscRNAdb (Chen et al, 2021a), Single-Cell Portal (Svensson et al, 2020), PsctH (Xu et al, 2022d), PCMDB (Jin et al, 2022), IonFlow (Iacovacci et al, 2021), scDEC (Liu et al, 2021b), RA3 (Chen et al, 2021b), epiAnno (Chen et al, 2022), and PlantCADB (Ke et al, 2022). When combined with computational biology, these databases have provided opportunities for sc-genome-wide approaches to assess different molecules, such as DNA, RNA, protein, and chromatin, with the highest resolution in many organisms, including plants (Libault et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2018;Argelaguet et al, 2021).…”
Section: Era Of Single-cell Omics-assisted Breeding For Crop Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%