2023
DOI: 10.1002/fee.2595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant selection for pollinator restoration in seminatural ecosystems

Abstract: Individual plant species play valuable roles in meeting restoration goals for pollinators. However, the selection of plant species for pollinator restoration is rarely informed using empirical evidence and is usually developed in agroecosystems, which experience frequent human interventions to ensure plant success as compared to seminatural ecosystems. We highlight concepts and future research needs to design planting mixes that fulfill the ecological requirements of pollinators in seminatural ecosystems. Nati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We make this assumption for three reasons: first, that it would be impractical to try and determine the floral preferences of each species in a community and therefore it is efficient to operate at the community level rather than that of the species or individual; second, that it has been shown to work (Maia et al, 2019); and third, because it would be useful. For example, incorporating a metric into a restoration framework, such as the one provided by Glenny et al (2023), will help practitioners to decide how to spend limited resources to maximise insect conservation efforts. Furthermore, preference metrics can be calculated for a single species or groups of species, which can be useful when determining the flower preferences of species of conservation concern (Glenny et al, 2023) or when targeting pollinators of a particular crop (Robson, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We make this assumption for three reasons: first, that it would be impractical to try and determine the floral preferences of each species in a community and therefore it is efficient to operate at the community level rather than that of the species or individual; second, that it has been shown to work (Maia et al, 2019); and third, because it would be useful. For example, incorporating a metric into a restoration framework, such as the one provided by Glenny et al (2023), will help practitioners to decide how to spend limited resources to maximise insect conservation efforts. Furthermore, preference metrics can be calculated for a single species or groups of species, which can be useful when determining the flower preferences of species of conservation concern (Glenny et al, 2023) or when targeting pollinators of a particular crop (Robson, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, incorporating a metric into a restoration framework, such as the one provided by Glenny et al (2023), will help practitioners to decide how to spend limited resources to maximise insect conservation efforts. Furthermore, preference metrics can be calculated for a single species or groups of species, which can be useful when determining the flower preferences of species of conservation concern (Glenny et al, 2023) or when targeting pollinators of a particular crop (Robson, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In some circumstances, non-native plants can support bees. Although incorporating native pollinator-friendly plants in urban and semi-urban habitats can increase pollinator abundance (Berthon et al, 2021;Rahimi et al, 2022;Glenny et al, 2023), non-native plants can also provide valuable floral resources for bees in urban areas. Non-natives are often tolerant of urban conditions, attract a wide variety of pollinators, and flower throughout the year (Frankie et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Value Of Native Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%