2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant-scale biogas production prediction based on multiple hybrid machine learning technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 The dry fermentation system's organic matter content and VFA buildup increase as feedstock quality improve. 30 When the feedstock quality is between 0 and 235 tons, its positive effect on the CH 4 content is highly significant as it increases. When the feedstock quality is less than 235 tons, the SHAP is a negative value.…”
Section: Interpretability Analysis Of Digester Prediction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 The dry fermentation system's organic matter content and VFA buildup increase as feedstock quality improve. 30 When the feedstock quality is between 0 and 235 tons, its positive effect on the CH 4 content is highly significant as it increases. When the feedstock quality is less than 235 tons, the SHAP is a negative value.…”
Section: Interpretability Analysis Of Digester Prediction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new direction of data-driven models has been explored to replace the traditional monod-based methods and bypass the complicated reaction processes via machine learning, , in which the historical data of AD parameters and biogas production have been statistically analyzed. Machine learning algorithm (MLA) manifests outstanding prediction results compared with conventional physiochemical models. , At least 70% of prediction reliability was achieved for small-size AD systems (<1000 m 3 ) through exploiting data collected at the annual base. The combination of microbial gene sequencing data and MLA has been performed to predict the CH 4 production through important phyla with error rate under 4% . However, there are two major problems with these MLA applications in AD systems (Figure a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, limited by the statistical essence, MLA can only grasp the internal correlation among the AD data at low spatiotemporal resolution, meaning that most of the transient reactions (e.g., acid–base neutralization reaction) and AD status changes (e.g., VFA accumulation, alkalinity variation) were ignored due to the lack of real-time indicators and inevitably led to the failure of predictions . Second, although the MLA possesses relatively good prediction accuracy (>70%), ,, its interpretability is inadequate at the physical system level and thus unable to provide efficient guidance for the analysis and control of AD processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have primarily focused on ML models for AD operated at a lab scale (Wang et al, 2021). However, modeling AD systems at full‐scale using ML algorithms can be challenging due to inconsistent data collection, irregular operation, and fluctuation in feed stream to ADs (Zhang, Li, et al, 2022). There are very few works to predict biogas production at full‐scale WWTPs using ML algorithms such as Random Forest (RF) models, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and K‐Nearest Neighbor (KNN) regression (de Clercq et al, 2019, 2020; Wang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%