2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03763.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant resistance to mechanical stress: evidence of an avoidance–tolerance trade‐off

Abstract: Summary• External mechanical forces resulting from the pressure exerted by wind or water movement are a major stress factor for plants and may cause regular disturbances in many ecosystems. A plant's ability to resist these forces relies either on minimizing the forces encountered by the plant (avoidance strategy), or on maximizing its resistance to breakage (tolerance strategy). We investigated plant resistance strategies using aquatic vegetation as a model, and examined whether avoidance and tolerance are ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
176
3
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
10
176
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher discharges and water velocities could cause the adoption of an avoidance strategy to prevent damage or destruction, which was characterised by an increase in shoot elasticity in line with the results of the study by Robionek et al [31]. According to Schutten et al [32] and Puijalon et al [33], aquatic plants are flexible and adjust to living factors by bending with the flow direction. This is an example of an avoidance strategy that helps them survive in different hydrological conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The higher discharges and water velocities could cause the adoption of an avoidance strategy to prevent damage or destruction, which was characterised by an increase in shoot elasticity in line with the results of the study by Robionek et al [31]. According to Schutten et al [32] and Puijalon et al [33], aquatic plants are flexible and adjust to living factors by bending with the flow direction. This is an example of an avoidance strategy that helps them survive in different hydrological conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Means with the same letters are not significantly different at P = 0.05 lignification of submersed macrophytes, since they are buoyant in water column and need not to be supported by their strong stems (Usherwood et al, 1997;Xiong et al, 2010). In general, the stems of submersed macrophytes can bend easily to accommodate hydraulic forces exerted on them, and thus make the forces essentially parallel to the shoots (Usherwood et al, 1997;Schutten & Davy, 2000;Schutten et al, 2005;Puijalon et al, 2011). The present results suggest that the tensile properties can represent the mechanical traits of submersed macrophyte stem, and give a reason why most studies just focus on the tensile properties in field and experiments (Schutten et al, 2005;Puijalon et al, 2011;Zhu et al 2012a, b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This result indicates that the upper shoots of the five submerged macrophytes were prone to damage by hydraulic forces, but H. verticillata and P. maackianus can withstand drag force for a considerably longer time. Such variations were also observed in ripe aquatic plants (Usherwood et al, 1997;Schutten et al, 2005;Puijalon et al, 2011;Miler et al, 2012). These differences are related to stem tissue structure and cellulose content (Denny, 1988;Sand-Jensen, 2003;Schutten et al, 2004;Zhu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Mechanical Resistance Response To Water Depth and Flood Intementioning
confidence: 89%
“…The stems of SAV can bend easily to accommodate hydrodynamic forces exerted on them, which make the forces essentially parallel to the shoots (Usherwood et al, 1997;Schutten & Davy 2000;Schutten et al, 2005;Puijalon et al, 2011). Hence, stem tensile properties are key targets for stem breaking resistance, as presented in most studies on SAV (e.g., Brewer & Parker, 1990;Schutten et al, 2005;Puijalon et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%