Plant Cell Culture 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780470686522.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Protoplasts: Isolation, Culture and Plant Regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Isolation efficiency examined for seven carrot accessions in the present work was relatively high, reaching from 2 to 5 9 10 6 protoplasts per g of leaf tissue and around 10 6 protoplasts per g of hypocotyl tissue. These values are similar to those reported for other species (Wiszniewska and Pindel 2009;Davey et al 2010). Lower protoplast yield obtained from hypocotyls than from leaves is still sufficiently high, even to perform protoplast fusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Isolation efficiency examined for seven carrot accessions in the present work was relatively high, reaching from 2 to 5 9 10 6 protoplasts per g of leaf tissue and around 10 6 protoplasts per g of hypocotyl tissue. These values are similar to those reported for other species (Wiszniewska and Pindel 2009;Davey et al 2010). Lower protoplast yield obtained from hypocotyls than from leaves is still sufficiently high, even to perform protoplast fusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Such recalcitrance of plant in vitro cultures is a widely known phenomenon-its importance was recognized from the very beginning of this research field (Benson 2000). With respect to protoplast cultures recalcitrance was noted for most monocotyledons, perennial woody species and legumes (Papadakis and Roubelakis-Angelakis 2002; Davey et al 2010). This list can be extended to include sugar beet as well, at least with respect to protoplasts of mesophyll origin (Hall et al 1993, MajewskaSawka andMünster 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of protoplast isolation and their quality, expressed by cell viability, are governed by several factors including: genotype; type of source tissue; mechanical procedures on source tissue (slicing or removal of the epidermis); conditioning of source tissue before enzyme maceration (dark or osmotic treatment); conditions of tissue digestion (i.e., composition of enzyme mixture, temperature and duration of enzyme incubation, pH of the enzyme solution, gentle agitation), and the method of protoplast isolation (Frearson et al 1973;Rao and Prakash 1995;Ortin-Parraga and Burgos 2003;Sinha et al 2003;Davey et al 2005c;Kiełkowska and Adamus 2012). When large populations of protoplasts are required, which is the norm for fusions, from 1 g of FW, between 10 5 and 10 7 viable cells should be released (Davey et al 2010). Though the protoplast yield obtained in the present study, varying from 1.4 to 4.5 9 10 6 , was genotypedependent, for all accessions it was even high enough to perform protoplast fusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%