Plant Naturalizations and Invasions in the Eastern United States: 1634-1860

Mack, Richard N.

doi:10.2307/3298528

Cited by 114 publications

(79 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the early 1700s, legislation began to pass to control barberry beginning with Connecticut in 1726 and followed by Massachusetts (1755) andRhode Island (1772). By the time control efforts were implemented, common barberry was widespread in 13 states (Mack 2003). The early 1900s commonly had severe stem rust epidemics which reduced yields 50.0 to 70.0 percent with some fields completely lost (Peterson et al 2005).…”

Section: Background and Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An assessment of invasive plant species monitored by the Northern Research Station Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, 2005 through 2010

Kurtz¹

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Background and Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Early descriptions of its infection on wheat are described in New England in the 1660s (Mack 2003). In the early 1700s, legislation began to pass to control barberry beginning with Connecticut in 1726 and followed by Massachusetts (1755) andRhode Island (1772).…”

Section: Background and Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An assessment of invasive plant species monitored by the Northern Research Station Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, 2005 through 2010

Kurtz¹

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We searched within the central European grassland flora for families with species that are known to have become invasive or naturalized on other continents (Uva et al 1997, Mack and Erneberg 2002, Mack 2003a, Cappuccino and Arnason 2006, USDA 2008, WEEDS 2008, ISSG 2009). We found six families with a total of 16 midor early-successional species that fulfilled the specification that they contained both potentially invasive and potentially naturalized species (Table 1).…”

Section: Species Pool and Seed Originmentioning

confidence: 99%

In their native range, invasive plants are held in check by negative soil-feedbacks

Zuppinger‐Dingley¹,

Schmid²,

Chen³

et al. 2011

Ecosphere

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The ability of some plant species to dominate communities in new biogeographical ranges has been attributed to an innate higher competitive ability and release from co-evolved specialist enemies. Specifically, invasive success in the new range might be explained by release from biotic negative soilfeedbacks, which control potentially dominant species in their native range. To test this hypothesis, we grew individuals from sixteen phylogenetically paired European grassland species that became either invasive or naturalized in new ranges, in either sterilized soil or in sterilized soil with unsterilized soil inoculum from their native home range. We found that although the native members of invasive species generally performed better than those of naturalized species, these native members of invasive species also responded more negatively to native soil inoculum than did the native members of naturalized species. This supports our hypothesis that potentially invasive species in their native range are held in check by negative soil-feedbacks. However, contrary to expectation, negative soil-feedbacks in potentially invasive species were not much increased by interspecific competition. There was no significant variation among families between invasive and naturalized species regarding their feedback response (negative vs. neutral). Therefore, we conclude that the observed negative soil feedbacks in potentially invasive species may be quite widespread in European families of typical grassland species.Key words: biotic interactions; enemy release; invasive species; native range; naturalized species; plant invasions; plant-soil feedbacks; soil inoculation; soil sterilization.

show abstract

“…(Plantaginaceae), common or yellow toadflax, a short-lived perennial forb native to most of Europe and northern Asia (Chater et al 1972;Sutton 1988), rapidly and comprehensively colonized temperate North America after its surmised seventeenth century eastern USA introduction (Mack 2003). This weed now occurs in all mainland states of the USA and most provinces and territories of Canada (USDA, NRCS 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biology and host specificity of Rhinusa pilosa, a recommended biological control agent of Linaria vulgaris

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Linaria vulgaris Mill. (Plantaginaceae), common or yellow toadflax, is a Eurasian short-lived perennial forb invasive throughout temperate North America. Rhinusa pilosa (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) is a univoltine shoot-galling weevil found exclusively on L. vulgaris in Europe. Under no-choice test conditions, 13 non-native Linaria species exposed to R. pilosa were accepted for oviposition and most were found to be suitable, to varying degrees, for gall and larval development.

show abstract

Plant Naturalizations and Invasions in the Eastern United States: 1634-1860

Cited by 114 publications

References 7 publications

An assessment of invasive plant species monitored by the Northern Research Station Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, 2005 through 2010

An assessment of invasive plant species monitored by the Northern Research Station Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, 2005 through 2010

In their native range, invasive plants are held in check by negative soil-feedbacks

Biology and host specificity of Rhinusa pilosa, a recommended biological control agent of Linaria vulgaris

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About