Plant-hyphomycete interactions in lowland central Burma

Thaung, Maung Mya

doi:10.1007/s13314-011-0026-6

Cited by 3 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, the pathogen has been reported to be associated with Citrus spp., Vitis vinifera , Hevea spp. (Sutton, 1980; Van Niekerk et al, 2004; Alvarez et al, 2016), Anogeissus acuminata (Thaung, 2008) and Caesalpinia pulcherrima (Alaka and Rao, 1998).…”

Section: Pest Categorisationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pest categorisation of Coniella granati

Bragard¹,

Baptista²,

Chatzivassiliou³

et al. 2023

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The EFSA Plant Health Panel performed a pest categorisation of Coniella granati, a clearly defined fungus of the Order Diaporthales and the family Schizoparmaceae, described for the first time in 1876 as Phoma granatii and later named as Pilidiella granati. The pathogen mainly affects Punica granatum (pomegranate) and Rosa spp. (rose), causing fruit rot, shoot blight and cankers on crown and branches. The pathogen is present in North America, South America, as well as in Asia, Africa, Oceania and Eastern Europe and has also been reported in the EU (Greece, Hungary, Italy and Spain), where it is widespread in the major pomegranate growing areas. Coniella granati is not included in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 and there are no interceptions in the EU. This pest categorisation focused on those hosts for which the pathogen was detected and formally identified in natural conditions. Plants for planting, fresh fruits and as well as soil and other plant growing media are the main pathways for the further entry of the pathogen into the EU. Host availability and climate suitability factors occurring in parts of the EU are favourable for the further establishment of the pathogen. In the area of its present distribution, including Italy and Spain, the pathogen has a direct impact in pomegranate orchards as well as during post-harvest storage. Phytosanitary measures are available to prevent the further introduction and spread of the pathogen into the EU. Coniella granati does not satisfy the criteria that are within the remit of EFSA to assess for this species to be regarded as potential Union quarantine pest as it is present in several EU MSs.

show abstract

Section: Pest Categorisationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pest categorisation of Coniella granati

Bragard¹,

Baptista²,

Chatzivassiliou³

et al. 2023

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…( 2021 ) Annona muricata Annonaceae Soursop Kruschewsky ( 2010 ) Araucaria spp. Araucariaceae Araucaria Thaung ( 2008 ), cited by Farr et al., 2021 ); Mordue ( 1980 ) Archontophoenix alexandrae Arecaceae Alexandra palm Ge et al. ( 2009 ), cited by Farr et al.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pest categorisation of Pestalotiopsis microspora

Bragard,

Baptista,

Chatzivassiliou

et al. 2023

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following an EFSA commodity risk assessment of bonsai plants (Pinus parviflora grafted on Pinus thunbergii) imported from China, the EFSA Plant Health Panel performed a pest categorisation of Pestalotiopsis microspora, a clearly defined plant pathogenic fungus of the family Pestalotiopsidaceae. The pathogen was reported on a wide range of monocotyledonous, dicotyledonous and gymnosperms, either cultivated or wild plant species, causing various symptoms such as leaf spot, leaf blight, scabby canker, fruit spot, pre-and post-harvest fruit rot and root rot. In addition, the fungus was reported as an endophyte on a wide range of asymptomatic plant species. This pest categorisation focuses on the hosts that are relevant for the EU and for which there is robust evidence that the pathogen was formally identified by a combination of morphology, pathogenicity and multilocus sequencing analyses. Pestalotiopsis microspora was reported in Africa, North, Central and South America, Asia and Oceania. In the EU, it was reported in the Netherlands. There is a key uncertainty on the geographical distribution of P. microspora worldwide and in the EU, because of the endophytic nature of the fungus, the lack of surveys, and because in the past, when molecular tools were not fully developed, the pathogen might have been misidentified as other Pestalotiopsis species or other members of the Pestalodiopsidaceae family based on morphology and pathogenicity tests. Pestalotiopsis microspora is not included in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072. Plants for planting, fresh fruits, bark and wood of host plants as well as soil and other growing media associated with plant debris are the main pathways for the entry of the pathogen into the EU. Host availability and climate suitability in parts of the EU are favourable for the establishment and spread of the pathogen. The introduction and spread of the pathogen into the EU are expected to have an economic and environmental impact where susceptible hosts are grown. Phytosanitary measures are available to prevent the introduction and spread of the pathogen into the EU. Unless the restricted distribution in the EU is disproven, Pestalotiopsis microspora satisfies all the criteria that are within the remit of EFSA to assess for this species to be regarded as potential Union quarantine pest.

show abstract

“…( 2023 ) Euphorbia milii Euphorbiaceae Christ thorn Urtiaga ( 1986 ) Fragaria vesca Rosaceae Wild strawberry Mathur ( 1979 ) Helianthus annuus Asteraceae Sunflower Kumar and Dwivedi ( 1981 ) Hemidesmus indicus Apocynaceae – Mathur ( 1979 ) Hymenaea torreana Fabaceae – Urtiaga ( 1986 ) Ixora sp. Rubiaceae – Johnston ( 1960 ) Ixora coccinea Rubiaceae Burning love Thaung ( 2008 ) Juniperus lucayana Cupressaceae – Urtiaga ( 1986 ) Kandelia candel Rhizophoraceae – Carrieri et al. ( 2013 ) …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…( 2020 ) Pinus taeda Pinaceae Loblolly pine Silva et al. ( 2020 ) Pithecolobium bigeminum Fabaceae – Thaung ( 2008 ) Podocarpus imbricatus Podocarpaceae Java dacryberry Tejesvi et al. ( 2009 ) Podocarpus macrophyllus Podocarpaceae Big‐leaf podocarp Zhuang ( 2001 ) Podocarpus macrophyllus var.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…( 2006 ) Rhizophora mucronata Rhizophoraceae – Mathur ( 1979 ) Rhodomyrtus tomentosa Myrtaceae Hill gooseberry Ge et al. ( 2009 ) Saraca indica Fabaceae Asoka tree Urtiaga ( 1986 ) Sideroxylon tomentosum Sapotaceae Hairy xantolis Thaung ( 2008 ) Stigmaphyllon sagraeanum Malpighiaceae – Urtiaga ( 1986 ) Strychnos sp. Loganiaceae – Syzygium cumini Myrtaceae Java plum Mathur ( 1979 ) Terminalia arjuna Combretaceae – Mathur ( 1979 ) Terminalia catappa Combretaceae Barbados almond Arnold ( 1986 ) …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Pest categorisation of Pestalotiopsis disseminata

Bragard,

Baptista,

Chatzivassiliou

et al. 2023

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following the commodity risk assessments of bonsai plants from China consisting of Pinus parviflora grafted on P. thunbergii performed by EFSA, the EFSA Plant Health Panel performed a pest categorisation of Pestalotiopsis disseminata, a clearly defined plant pathogenic fungus of the family Pestalotiopsidaceae. The pathogen has been reported on herbaceous, woody and ornamental plants causing symptoms such as leaf blight, shoot blight, seedling blight, pod canker, preand post-harvest fruit rot, and gummosis. Moreover, the fungus was reported as an endophyte on a wide range of asymptomatic hosts. The pathogen is present in Africa, North and South America, Asia, Europe and Oceania. It has been reported from the EU, with a restricted distribution (Portugal). There is a key uncertainty on the geographical distribution of P. disseminata in the EU and worldwide, because of the endophytic nature of the fungus, the lack of surveys and since the pathogen might have been misidentified based only on morphology and pathogenicity tests. The pathogen is not included in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072. This pest categorisation focuses on those hosts that are relevant for the EU and for which there is robust evidence that the pathogen was formally identified by a combination of morphology, pathogenicity and multilocus sequence analysis. Plants for planting, fresh fruits, bark and wood of host plants as well as soil and other plant growing media are the main pathways for the entry of the pathogen into the EU. Host availability and climate suitability factors occurring in parts of the EU are favourable for the establishment of the pathogen. Despite the low aggressiveness observed in most reported hosts, and the fact that P. disseminata may colonise plants as an endophyte, its introduction and spread in the EU may have an economic and environmental impact (with a key uncertainty) where susceptible hosts are grown. Phytosanitary measures are available to prevent the introduction and spread of the pathogen. The Panel cannot conclude on whether P. disseminata satisfies all the criteria that are within the remit of EFSA to assess for this species to be regarded as potential Union quarantine pest, because of the key uncertainties on the restricted distribution in the EU and the magnitude of the impact. K E Y W O R D S endophytes, eucalyptus leaf spot, Euonymus japonicus, pest risk, pine shoot blight, plant pest, Psidium guava 2 of 28 |

show abstract

Plant-hyphomycete interactions in lowland central Burma

Cited by 3 publications

References 12 publications

Pest categorisation of Coniella granati

Pest categorisation of Coniella granati

Pest categorisation of Pestalotiopsis microspora

Pest categorisation of Pestalotiopsis disseminata

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About