2017
DOI: 10.4172/2376-0354.1000215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) Reduces Application Rates of Fertilizers in Chili (Capsicum frutescens L.) Cultivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first season showed that application of both isolates resulted in a decline in wheat yield when P levels fell below 50%, however, a significant increase in wheat yield was observed when P levels reached or exceeded 50% P. This resonates with previous research findings on tomato, chilli, and wheat regarding optimal fertilizer-use efficiency using PGPR that suggested a 75% fertilizer level precedes PGPR performance stability deterioration [ 22 , 29 , 30 ], albeit using a PGPR consortium. During the second season, T19 exhibited its capacity to enhance wheat yield, while isolate T29 consistently reduced wheat yield across all levels of P. During the final season, both isolates increased wheat yield above 25% P, except for isolate T19 which demonstrated a significant decrease at 25% P and 100% P. This phenomenon emphasizes the context-dependent nature of PGPR performance, which can vary even among individual isolates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first season showed that application of both isolates resulted in a decline in wheat yield when P levels fell below 50%, however, a significant increase in wheat yield was observed when P levels reached or exceeded 50% P. This resonates with previous research findings on tomato, chilli, and wheat regarding optimal fertilizer-use efficiency using PGPR that suggested a 75% fertilizer level precedes PGPR performance stability deterioration [ 22 , 29 , 30 ], albeit using a PGPR consortium. During the second season, T19 exhibited its capacity to enhance wheat yield, while isolate T29 consistently reduced wheat yield across all levels of P. During the final season, both isolates increased wheat yield above 25% P, except for isolate T19 which demonstrated a significant decrease at 25% P and 100% P. This phenomenon emphasizes the context-dependent nature of PGPR performance, which can vary even among individual isolates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Contextualizing our findings alongside the impact of soil phosphate (P i ) levels on the individual isolates sourced from the Breedt et al [ 23 ] consortium, it becomes evident that soil P i concentration plays a pivotal role in shaping the ability of these individual isolates to influence wheat yield. Studies by Wang et al [ 22 ], Adesemoye et al, [ 29 ], and Batool and Altaf [ 30 ] have similarly emphasized the importance of soil nutrient dynamics in modulating PGPR efficacy. This reinforces the need to consider soil P i levels as a critical factor in the design and execution of future PGPR optimization trials within wheat cultivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and optimizing the chili production. Microorganisms that naturally associated with plant roots or better known as PGPR can improve growth and control plant diseases (Batool & Altaf, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%