2018
DOI: 10.1111/lam.13042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant growth promoting bacteria associated with corm ofCrocus sativusduring three growth stages

Abstract: Corm, being a unit of reproduction and storage, plays an indispensable role in the life cycle of Crocus sativus (saffron). This study deals with the screening of bacteria isolated from cormosphere (area surrounding the corm sheath) of C. sativus during three growth stages for biofertilizer and biocontrol property. Out of 1000 protease producing bacteria isolated from the cormosphere (soil adhering corm sheath in analogy to rhizosphere), three plant growth promoting (PGP) Bacilli namely Bacillus thuringiensis D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacillus subtilis EA-CB0575 from banana rhizosphere increased the total dry weight (root + shoot) of banana plant by 34.60% under green house conditions 67 . In the present study, the increase in root-shoot length and number attributed to the production of phytoharmone IAA, phosphate solubilization and siderophore production by Bar D5 making inslouble nutrients present in soil, available to plant and increase in cormlets production could be due to starch hydrolysis and IAA production by Bacillus strain 28 . The starch hydrolysis in saffron corm helps the floral, vegetative buds and roots to differentiate during dormancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Bacillus subtilis EA-CB0575 from banana rhizosphere increased the total dry weight (root + shoot) of banana plant by 34.60% under green house conditions 67 . In the present study, the increase in root-shoot length and number attributed to the production of phytoharmone IAA, phosphate solubilization and siderophore production by Bar D5 making inslouble nutrients present in soil, available to plant and increase in cormlets production could be due to starch hydrolysis and IAA production by Bacillus strain 28 . The starch hydrolysis in saffron corm helps the floral, vegetative buds and roots to differentiate during dormancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Bar D5 based bio-formulation was also found to be better than previously reported three different bio-formulations by our group on the basis of pot assay evaluation Table 5. Earlier bio-formulations were (i) bacterial consortia comprising of (Chryseobacterium elymi WRF4, Pseudomonas tremae WRF2, Acetinobacteria calcoaceticus WRF1, Bacillus aryabhattai WRF5, Pseudomonas kilonensis WRF3 and Pseudomonas koreensis WRF6A 26 (ii) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens W2 8 and (iii) bacilli consortia comprising of Bacillus thurinniensis DC1, Bacillus megaterium VC3 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DC8 28 . Previously, reported Bacillus aryabhattai strains associated with saffron rhizosphere 26 and cormosphere 28 are from saffron fields in Kashmir.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This explains the dominance of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes in the cormosphere, which are among the most dominant phyla in the soil and maybe getting transferred from the soil, just like in rhizosphere (Miyashita, 2015;Fierer, 2017;Compant et al, 2019). To our knowledge, cormosphere microbiome has not been studied in any other plant, except for saffron reported previously by our group (Ambardar and Vakhlu, 2013;Ambardar, 2014;Ambardar et al, 2014Ambardar et al, , 2016Kour et al, 2018) from Kashmir, India (Chamkhi et al, 2018), and from Taliouine, Morocco. Previous reports by our group have also confirmed the dominance of Proteobacteria in Kashmir saffron rhizosphere and cormosphere, even though the method used was cultivation dependent and 16S targeted metagenome sequencing was different than the methods used in the present study (Ambardar and Vakhlu, 2013;Ambardar et al, 2014) (Supplementary Material 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%