2011
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-4-993-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant functional type mapping for earth system models

Abstract: Abstract. The sensitivity of global carbon and water cycling to climate variability is coupled directly to land cover and the distribution of vegetation. To investigate biogeochemistryclimate interactions, earth system models require a representation of vegetation distributions that are either prescribed from remote sensing data or simulated via biogeography models. However, the abstraction of earth system state variables in models means that data products derived from remote sensing need to be post-processed … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
177
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
177
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This uncertainty in PFT distributions results from both incomplete bioclimatic information to define the fundamental niche, and to the complexity of modeling species competitive interactions that define the realized niche. To better represent present-day managed and natural land cover, four plant functional type datasets were created using a uniform methodology that combined Köppen-Geiger climate zones (delineated with climate data from the Global Historical Climatological Network v2.0 (Peel et al, 2007)) with physiognomy and phenology-type, and managed or natural grasslands, from land-cover data provided by MODIS (V004 and V005), GLC2000, and GlobCover (Table 2; Poulter et al, 2011). The satellite derived PFT fractions were prescribed directly to the maximum annual FPAR variable in LPJ, which defines the fraction of photosynthetic active radiation (FPAR) absorbed by each PFT and is equal to that PFT's fractional coverage.…”
Section: Forcing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This uncertainty in PFT distributions results from both incomplete bioclimatic information to define the fundamental niche, and to the complexity of modeling species competitive interactions that define the realized niche. To better represent present-day managed and natural land cover, four plant functional type datasets were created using a uniform methodology that combined Köppen-Geiger climate zones (delineated with climate data from the Global Historical Climatological Network v2.0 (Peel et al, 2007)) with physiognomy and phenology-type, and managed or natural grasslands, from land-cover data provided by MODIS (V004 and V005), GLC2000, and GlobCover (Table 2; Poulter et al, 2011). The satellite derived PFT fractions were prescribed directly to the maximum annual FPAR variable in LPJ, which defines the fraction of photosynthetic active radiation (FPAR) absorbed by each PFT and is equal to that PFT's fractional coverage.…”
Section: Forcing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty of NEE in northern regions is mainly controlled by RH uncertainty (implying greater temperature sensitivity of soil respiration), whereas in topical and arid regions, NPP and RH uncertainty are equally important. differences in how the classification systems handled forest cover thresholds (Poulter et al, 2011;Fritz and See, 2008). Due to these classification differences, the GLC2000 and GlobCover datasets tended to have 4-5 % higher woody vegetation in warm regions, which MODIS categorized as C4 grasslands.…”
Section: Comparison Of Forcing Data and Carbon Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutions of other productions and other cropland areas are forced by external scenarios. Areas of permanent pastures are taken from Ramankutty et al (2008) and forests areas from Poulter et al (2011). On grid points where the sum of forest, pasture and cropland fractions exceed 100 %, forest fractions were reduced to match 100 %.…”
Section: Biomass Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main input data for each region of the model at the base year 2001. Cropland and pasture areas are from Ramankutty et al (2008) and forests areas from Poulter et al (2011), other data are from Agribiom (Dorin, 2011). Population is in millions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areas of permanent pastures are taken from and forests areas from Poulter et al [2011]. The forest category includes managed and unmanaged forests.…”
Section: Modelling Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%