2015
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-2315-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant functional type classification for earth system models: results from the European Space Agency's Land Cover Climate Change Initiative

Abstract: Abstract. Global land cover is a key variable in the earth system with feedbacks on climate, biodiversity and natural resources. However, global land cover data sets presently fall short of user needs in providing detailed spatial and thematic information that is consistently mapped over time and easily transferable to the requirements of earth system models. In 2009, the European Space Agency launched the Climate Change Initiative (CCI), with land cover (LC_CCI) as 1 of 13 essential climate variables targeted… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
226
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(69 reference statements)
2
226
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we define the fraction of an ESA land cover class that is actually covered by cropland and pasture (numbers in Table 1): on cropland and grassland land cover types this is assumed to be 90 % to account for small areas of infrastructure, wetlands, unsuitable terrain, steep slopes or small patches of vegetation that are not explicitly identified in the original land cover product (Verburg et al, 2009). The mosaic cropland land cover types are defined to have 60 and 40 % of cropland or pasture following the managed grass definition of Poulter et al (2015). First, cropland is allocated, then grazing land.…”
Section: Cropland and Grazing Land Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we define the fraction of an ESA land cover class that is actually covered by cropland and pasture (numbers in Table 1): on cropland and grassland land cover types this is assumed to be 90 % to account for small areas of infrastructure, wetlands, unsuitable terrain, steep slopes or small patches of vegetation that are not explicitly identified in the original land cover product (Verburg et al, 2009). The mosaic cropland land cover types are defined to have 60 and 40 % of cropland or pasture following the managed grass definition of Poulter et al (2015). First, cropland is allocated, then grazing land.…”
Section: Cropland and Grazing Land Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The product is based on medium-resolution satellite observation and provides information on the vegetation distribution us- ing land cover classes (LCC) defined by the United Nations Land Cover Classification System (UNLCCS). In order to match the satellite land cover classes with the PFTs coverage in ORCHIDEE, we use a conversion table established by Poulter et al (2015). Note that the climate classification system of Köppen (Peel et al, 2007) is also used to further partition some vegetation types into tropical, temperate and boreal zones (see also Poulter et al, 2015).…”
Section: Vegetation Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Lichens and mosses" LCC were classified by Poulter et al (2015) into C 3 grasses and bare soil PFTs, and now are used to define a separate NVP PFT (Table S1). However, the NVP coverage that corresponds to the lichens and mosses LCC is clearly underestimated with the CCI product over Eurasia compared to North America and to other pan-Arctic land cover maps (i.e.…”
Section: Vegetation Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PFT map layer of the MODIS MCD12Q1 product was directly used. CCI LC uses the default cross-walking table given by Poulter et al (2015) to convert the LC class maps to PFT maps. The FROM-GLC conversion process used the class legend description, with each LC type being classified into the corresponding PFT.…”
Section: Satellite Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%