2020
DOI: 10.1111/plb.13082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant functional trait response to environmental drivers across European temperate forest understorey communities

Abstract: Functional traits respond to environmental drivers, hence evaluating trait-environment relationships across spatial environmental gradients can help to understand how multiple drivers influence plant communities. Global-change drivers such as changes in atmospheric nitrogen deposition occur worldwide, but affect community trait distributions at the local scale, where resources (e.g. light availability) and conditions (e.g. soil pH) also influence plant communities.• We investigate how multiple environmental dr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
(195 reference statements)
9
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trait-based approaches are useful for inferring the underlying mechanisms responsible for shaping understory plant assemblages. Disentangling the relative importance of the different processes involved in community assembly (e.g., abiotic filtering, limiting similarity, dispersal limitation) is not only interesting in itself but also crucial for understanding how communities will behave under future environmental scenarios, e.g., temporal changes in understory vegetation due to global environmental change or increasing impacts of disturbances [84,85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Trait-based approaches are useful for inferring the underlying mechanisms responsible for shaping understory plant assemblages. Disentangling the relative importance of the different processes involved in community assembly (e.g., abiotic filtering, limiting similarity, dispersal limitation) is not only interesting in itself but also crucial for understanding how communities will behave under future environmental scenarios, e.g., temporal changes in understory vegetation due to global environmental change or increasing impacts of disturbances [84,85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of clonal and bud bank traits, which are associated with vegetative propagation and the re-sprouting ability of plants [8], might be insightful in this context. Similarly, below-ground traits and traits associated with root system properties, including mycorrhizal status, are likely to play an important role in the understory composition of mature forest stands [85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SLA is a succession trait, which increases in response to shading (Dahlgren et al, 2006) , whereas LDMC has probably decreased because of its negative covariance with SLA as part of the community-level leaf economics spectrum (Bruelheide et al, 2018) . The negative correlation between canopy SLA and field layer SLA was surprising, since we would have expected canopy leaf traits to correlate positively with field layer leaf traits via litter decomposition-mediated resource availability effects (Maes et al, 2019) . Low canopy SLA is an indicator of relative abundance of Picea abies , an evergreen species with long-lived leaves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some of these management practices, such as ditching and harrowing, directly affect understories by manipulating the soils they inhabit. On the other hand, the tree-layer is a major modulator of resource availability in the understory, as light availability and the amount and quality of litter directly influence growing conditions in the field-layer (Maes et al, 2019) . More information is needed about how different forest management practices affect understories in the long-term (Su et al, 2019) , but differentiating between direct and canopy-mediated effects of management requires long-term concurrent monitoring of canopies and understories in both natural and managed forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%