Thioredoxins (Thrxs) -small globular proteins that reduce other proteins -are ubiquitous in all forms of life, from archaea to mammals. Although ancestral Thioredoxins share sequential and structural similarity with the modern day (extant) homologs, they exhibit significantly different functional activity and stability. We investigate this puzzle by comparative studies of their (ancient and modern day Thrxs') native state ensemble, as quantified by the Dynamic Flexibility Index (DFI), a metric for the relative resilience of an amino acid to perturbations in the rest of the protein.Clustering proteins using DFI profiles strongly resembles an alternate classification scheme based on their activity and stability. The DFI profiles of the extant proteins are substantially different around the α3, α4 helices and catalytic regions. Likewise, allosteric coupling of the active site with the rest of the protein is different between ancient and extant Thrxs, possibly explaining the decreased catalytic activity at low pH with evolution. At a global level, we note that the population of low flexibility (called hinges) and high flexibility sites increases with evolution. The heterogeneity (quantified by the variance) in DFI distribution increases with the decrease in the melting temperature typically associated with the evolution of ancient proteins to their modernday counterparts.
Introduction:Modern proteins have evolved through small changes from ancient times. Much of this information is encoded in protein classes from different species in the three kingdoms of life (bacteria, archaea, and eukarya). With the advances in phylogenetics and DNA-synthesis techniques, the various ancient genes, including those from the last common ancestors of bacteria, bilaterian animals, and vertebrates, have been resurrected in the laboratories. These studies have provided crucial insights about the environmental adaptations and the evolution of functions [1-8]: (i) ancestral proteins are more robust showing high thermal and chemical stability [9][10][11][12][13], and more interestingly, (ii) protein structures are conserved more than protein sequences throughout the molecular evolution [12][13][14][15]. Thus, the current challenge in molecular evolution is to understand the molecular mechanism of how nature alters the function and biophysical properties through amino acid substitutions, while conserving the 3-D structure.