Eriophyoid Mites: Progress and Prognoses 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9562-6_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant–eriophyoid mite interactions: specific and unspecific morphological alterations. Part II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely to be because of their relatively small size, 200–250 µm long on average, and their greatly simplified morphology (Nuzzaci & Alberti, ). About 10% of the 5000 described species of eriophyoid mites induce formation of galls on host plants including erinea, leaf‐rolling, big buds, pouch galls and various others (Westphal, ; Petanović & Kielkiewicz, ). The results of recent molecular phylogenetic studies on Eriophyoidea suggest that the gain and loss of the ability to cause galls happened in parallel to different unrelated lineages of eriophyoid mites and thus influenced speciation (Li et al, , ; Chetverikov et al, , ; Cvrković et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely to be because of their relatively small size, 200–250 µm long on average, and their greatly simplified morphology (Nuzzaci & Alberti, ). About 10% of the 5000 described species of eriophyoid mites induce formation of galls on host plants including erinea, leaf‐rolling, big buds, pouch galls and various others (Westphal, ; Petanović & Kielkiewicz, ). The results of recent molecular phylogenetic studies on Eriophyoidea suggest that the gain and loss of the ability to cause galls happened in parallel to different unrelated lineages of eriophyoid mites and thus influenced speciation (Li et al, , ; Chetverikov et al, , ; Cvrković et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5D, E). The mechanism underlying this leaf-rolling symptom is not known, but it might be caused by the injection of specific salivary secretions into host-cells during mite feeding (Petanovic & Kielkiewicz 2010). 5F) (Baker et al 1986).…”
Section: Molecular Identification Of Aceria Zoysiaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wounding and injecting of specific salivary secretions into host-cells result in a specific response of the affected leaf, stem, or bud tissues; such as gall differentiation, hypersensitive reaction, or non-distortive feeding effects and in some cases complex symptoms, considered as syndromes (Petanović & Kielkiewicz 2010). Most species are monophagous and many species are limited to plant species within a single genus, with few exceptions (Zhang 2003).…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%